2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categorical priming of famous person recognition: A hitherto overlooked methodological factor can resolve a long-standing debate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, two types of models have been proposed to account for the organization of famous person knowledge. According to one view, biographical knowledge is organized in a categorical way (Burton, Bruce, & Johnstone, 1990;Stone, 2008) and is shared by different individuals. Alternatively, person knowledge may also be organized in an associative way (Schweinberger, 1996;Wiese & Schweinberger, 2011), depending on the patterns of association between a famous person and specific life events experienced by this person.…”
Section: Famous Person Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, two types of models have been proposed to account for the organization of famous person knowledge. According to one view, biographical knowledge is organized in a categorical way (Burton, Bruce, & Johnstone, 1990;Stone, 2008) and is shared by different individuals. Alternatively, person knowledge may also be organized in an associative way (Schweinberger, 1996;Wiese & Schweinberger, 2011), depending on the patterns of association between a famous person and specific life events experienced by this person.…”
Section: Famous Person Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are both highly associated (because they co-occur regularly) and categorically related (since both are Hollywood actors), it is possible to combine two actors who are not associated because they never appeared in the same movie (such as Hugh Grant and Brad Pitt). While initial studies did not observe priming for categorically related pairs (Barry et al, 1998;Young, Flude, Hellawell, & Ellis, 1994), a number of more recent experiments demonstrated this effect (Carson & Burton, 2001;Stone, 2008;Stone & Valentine, 2007;Wiese & Schweinberger, 2008, 2011. The typically observed "associative boost", which reflects stronger priming for associated (e.g., Jolie !…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In typical semantic priming paradigms using faces, the prime and probe pertain to famous people (known to participants), and priming is defined by the reduction in response time (RT) to make a fame decision about a probe face as a function of whether or not the person denoted by the prime is categorically (or associatively) related to the probe (e.g., a famous person with the same occupation; Wiese & Schweinberger, 2008). Such priming has been reported even when the prime was masked and for the first occurrence of a face as a prime, which precludes any contribution from S-R learning (Stone, 2008;Stone & Valentine, 2006;Wiese, Henson, & Schweinberger, 2011). …”
Section: Subliminal Priming Of Facesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, semantic priming of the type studied by Stone (2008), for example, where prime and probe identities share an occupation, is not possible to test for unfamiliar faces, which possess no associated associative/categorical information. Such priming can be studied using congruency priming, however, since unfamiliar faces can be categorized according to dimensions like famous/nonfamous, or male/female.…”
Section: Subliminal Priming Of Facesmentioning
confidence: 99%