2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.06.072
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categorical Rhythms Are Shared between Songbirds and Humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
113
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
113
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, acoustic similarities between birdsong and human speech give rise to surfacelevel perceptual features of birdsong that may be particularly salient to human infants. Songbirds produce complex songs that are harmonically rich and incorporate phonological syntax and prosodic properties (e.g., rhythm, pitch excursions, changes in duration, intonation-like patterns) that resemble aspects of human speech [21,28,29]. Converging evidence for these perceptual similarities comes from very young infants' perceptual preferences.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, acoustic similarities between birdsong and human speech give rise to surfacelevel perceptual features of birdsong that may be particularly salient to human infants. Songbirds produce complex songs that are harmonically rich and incorporate phonological syntax and prosodic properties (e.g., rhythm, pitch excursions, changes in duration, intonation-like patterns) that resemble aspects of human speech [21,28,29]. Converging evidence for these perceptual similarities comes from very young infants' perceptual preferences.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In further experiments, the authors determined that “intermediate” notes tended to be classified as “short” if they fell at the beginning of a syllable and “long” if they fell at the end. Roeske et al's ( 2020 ) discovery of small ratio, categorical rhythms in Thrush Nightingale songs suggests a similar perceptual grounding—scrambling note order redistributes the onset-to-onset interval times in a given song, possibly shifting them toward ratios less typical (and therefore possibly less preferred) for the species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, they are merely available for aesthetic evaluation by receivers, and subject to subsequent sexual or social selection. However, the sharing of components of musicality by some complex bird songs and human music implies that these avian acoustic signals are extremely non-random in another way—their aesthetic impact upon the receiver (Rothenberg et al, 2014 ; Roeske et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations