“…More recently, scholars have started to theorize about important heterogeneities both within and across audiences (e.g., Beunza & Garud, 2007; Falchetti et al, 2022; Kim & Jensen, 2011; Kovács & Sharkey, 2014; Pontikes, 2012) due to differences in their theories of value (Lamont, 2012; Zuckerman & Rao, 2004), degrees of domain‐relevant expertise (Falchetti et al, 2022), preferences and perspectives (Pontikes, 2012; Taeuscher, Zhao, & Lounsbury, 2022), calculative frames (Beunza & Garud, 2007), path‐dependent evaluation routines (Theeke et al, 2018), and goals and motivations (Bowers, 2020; Bowers & Prato, 2019; Glaser et al, 2020). Therefore, when audiences evaluate a firm, they may embrace different categorization schemas, judge the firm through different lenses (Beunza & Garud, 2007; Pontikes, 2012), and compare the firm with different reference groups (Bowers, 2015; Goodman & Haisley, 2007; Smith & Chae, 2017), giving rise to different predispositions toward the firm.…”