2013
DOI: 10.1080/03235408.2012.738520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categorisation of 10 sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas(L.) Lam.) varieties for resistance toMeloidogynespp. in organic field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…are considered the most serious pest and have the ability to seriously reduce the yield and quality of sweetpotato. They cause chlorosis of the leaves and produce root galls which then leave the roots susceptible to secondary infection during the growing period or during storage (Atungwu et al, 2012;Clark et al, 2013).…”
Section: Plant Parasitic Nematodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…are considered the most serious pest and have the ability to seriously reduce the yield and quality of sweetpotato. They cause chlorosis of the leaves and produce root galls which then leave the roots susceptible to secondary infection during the growing period or during storage (Atungwu et al, 2012;Clark et al, 2013).…”
Section: Plant Parasitic Nematodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extended fallow period can reduce levels of nematodes, however, this option is not always available for smallholder farmers, so the development of resistant varieties is the best option. There are numerous varieties showing tolerance or resistance to nematodes across PNG and the Pacific, however in other parts of the world resistance is not reported as commonly (Kokoa, 2001;Atungwu et al, 2012;Suzuki et al, 2012). Clark et al (2013) describes over 30 diseases of sweetpotato caused by a greater number of pathogens among which are at least 30 known sweetpotato viruses.…”
Section: Plant Parasitic Nematodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Noble (2011) and Zachow et al (2011), this fungus attack is more severe in sandy soils because the S. rolfsii fungus requires aerobic oxygen (O2), and in soil conditions with low nitrogen content and high temperatures. Therefore, another alternative is needed to control the stem rot disease such as using fungicides (Bhuiyan et al, 2012;El-Mohamedy et al, 2014), organic amendments (Hadar, 2011;Lahre et al, 2012;Paramasivan et al, 2013), soil solarization (Raj and Sharma, 2009;Lee et al, 2016), botanical pesticides (Amin et al, 29013), rhizobacteria (Hapsah, 2019), and bio-agents (Rakh et al, 2011;Lahre et al, 2012). Each method has its advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%