Categorising and labelling entrepreneurs: Business support organisations constructing the Other through prefixes of ethnicity and immigrantship

Abstract

This article demonstrates how Swedish support organisations approach and target immigrant entrepreneurs in terms of categorisation and labelling. In their strategic positioning, and as a result of framing and communicating specific target groups for their activities, organisations simultaneously produce and reproduce categories of clients. We argue that despite its emancipatory intent, the process of categorisation runs the risk of reproducing an inferior Other. Adding prefixes in labelling entrepreneurs may replicate the societal hierarchies that business support initiatives were designed to counteract. This article questions the basis of business support for minority entrepreneurs and is a contribution to wider debates concerned with exposing the constructed nature of entrepreneurship.

A Web of opportunity or the same old story? Women digital entrepreneurs and intersectionality theory

“…Generally, potential entrepreneurs with high levels of education, financial capital, business experience and industry contacts are more likely to create ventures which endure and grow (Jones, 2014;Wright et al, 2015); this is the case in the high-tech sphere as well (Braguinsky et al, 2012). Our empirical evidence supports this argument, as the influence of social class upon resource acquisition was fundamental, despite the digital context being lauded as requiring few resources to facilitate new venture creation.…”

Breaking-out? A reconceptualisation of the business development process through diversification: the case of Polish new migrant entrepreneurs in Glasgow

“…Hence it contributes to debates on breaking out to new markets and networks, and on barriers ethnic entrepreneurs' business development, proposing the diversification process as a useful theoretical framework to analyse ethnic entrepreneurs' business development activities. By considering entrepreneurship from a mixed embeddedness perspective, and in the light of recent recommendations by Carter et al (2015) or Högberg et al (2016), understanding the diversification process among different migrant or ethnic minority groups can inform policymakers and business support professionals about this stage in new migrant entrepreneurs' business life-cycles. Further, in the context of uncertainty provoked by the Brexit process, this research stresses key issues of integration of migrants within the UK society.…”

“…First, further development of migrant businesses (not just growth) -referred to as breakout strategies (Jones et al 2000;Engelen 2001;Smallbone et al 2005;Rusinovic 2008a; Smallbone et al 2010; Wang and Altinay 2012) is a research gap. Second, it informs the provision of adequate policy support to new migrant entrepreneurs (Högberg et al 2016).…”

Immigrant entrepreneurs in a changing institutional context : a mixed embeddedness approach

“…While many studies on immigrant entrepreneurship in Sweden are based on interviews (e.g. Hogberg et al, 2014;Evansluong, 2016), fewer studies use predictive methods and quantitative data to test the ME approach, even though it was acknowledged a decade ago (Kloosterman and Rath, 2003).…”