Categorization of Dental Fractures

Bakland, Leif K.; Tamse, Aviad

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16847-0_2

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Craze lines affect only the enamel, are not associated with any pulpal or periapical pathology, cause no concern beyond esthetics, and thus were not included in the current study. VRFs are rootoriginating fractures that may originate anywhere in the root, occur primarily in endodontically treated teeth (Bakland and Tamse 2015) and were not included in the current study as well. Fractured cusp, cracked tooth, and split tooth describe longitudinal or variations of crownoriginating fractures (Kang et al 2016;Bakland and Tamse 2015).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…VRFs are rootoriginating fractures that may originate anywhere in the root, occur primarily in endodontically treated teeth (Bakland and Tamse 2015) and were not included in the current study as well. Fractured cusp, cracked tooth, and split tooth describe longitudinal or variations of crownoriginating fractures (Kang et al 2016;Bakland and Tamse 2015). These were included in the current study and were categorized as one category termed "cracked teeth" (Bakland and Tamse 2015).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fractured cusp, cracked tooth, and split tooth describe longitudinal or variations of crownoriginating fractures (Kang et al 2016;Bakland and Tamse 2015). These were included in the current study and were categorized as one category termed "cracked teeth" (Bakland and Tamse 2015). Thus, although limited in its extent, this case series is the first clinical report of this possible serious complication of implantassociated non-endodontically treated cracked teeth.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Implant-associated cracked teeth: case series

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This study presents a series of 18 cases of cracked non-endodontically treated teeth that were diagnosed following the placement of adjacent implant-supported rehabilitation. These findings could suggest a possible cause/ related events. Results: Most of the cases occurred in female patients (61%), over 50 years old (78%, with an average age of 59 years). Nine (50%) of the cracked teeth were molars, 7 (39%) were mandibular premolars, and 2 (11%) were incisor teeth. Most of the cracked teeth (61%) had an amalgam restoration, 50% had deep periodontal pockets, and 78% had vital pulps. In 78% of patients, multiple implants were placed (with an average of 3 implants per patient). The time from implant loading to the diagnosis of a crack was longer than 1 year in 78% of cases. Conclusions: The most common patient profile found in this series was a woman over 50 years old, having a cracked mandibular premolar tooth, which was diagnosed more than 1 year after reconstruction based on multiple adjacent implants. Additional clinical studies are warranted in order to shed light on this potential complication.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Implant-associated cracked teeth: case series

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Crown origination fracture (COF) usually occur in premolars and molars, in nonendodontically treated teeth (vital and non-vital) with symptoms related to the diseased pulp, while rootoriginating fractures (ROF) occur in root canal-treated teeth with or without coronal restoration and symptoms related to chronic or acute periapical disease (Bakland & Tamse 2015).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although in recent years, more information regarding these two entities was published in the scientific journals; there is still confusion and perplexity in the literature regarding the etiology, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations of these entities (Bakland and Tamse 2015).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%