2008
DOI: 10.3758/mc.36.3.544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Category labels versus feature labels: Category labels polarize inferential predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wagner, Holtz, and Kashima (2009) discuss the examples of members of the US Marine Corps, who discursively undergo a physical transformation of their essence after becoming a marine (in the sense of rhetorically becoming irreversibly a different kind of human being; once a marine -always a marine) as well as discourses on hereditary nobility in Europe. In fact, even nonsensical category labels such as 'zav' can induce essentialist thinking among children (Heyman & Gelman, 2000); among adults as well, arbitrary and nonsensical category labels could be shown to affect inductive processes very much like the supposed 'natural kind categories' such as gender and ethnicity that are most often studied in research on psychological essentialism (Yamauchi & Yu, 2008). Taking into account that even a vague reference to family members' ties to the PKI can have detrimental consequences for Indonesians as pointed out beforehand, it can be assumed that PKI-affiliation is to some degree an essentialized category in so far as the stigma of PKIaffiliation can apparently be transmitted across generations in the same way that bodily characteristics are passed on from parents to their offspring.…”
Section: Psychological Essentialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wagner, Holtz, and Kashima (2009) discuss the examples of members of the US Marine Corps, who discursively undergo a physical transformation of their essence after becoming a marine (in the sense of rhetorically becoming irreversibly a different kind of human being; once a marine -always a marine) as well as discourses on hereditary nobility in Europe. In fact, even nonsensical category labels such as 'zav' can induce essentialist thinking among children (Heyman & Gelman, 2000); among adults as well, arbitrary and nonsensical category labels could be shown to affect inductive processes very much like the supposed 'natural kind categories' such as gender and ethnicity that are most often studied in research on psychological essentialism (Yamauchi & Yu, 2008). Taking into account that even a vague reference to family members' ties to the PKI can have detrimental consequences for Indonesians as pointed out beforehand, it can be assumed that PKI-affiliation is to some degree an essentialized category in so far as the stigma of PKIaffiliation can apparently be transmitted across generations in the same way that bodily characteristics are passed on from parents to their offspring.…”
Section: Psychological Essentialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the studies examining the role of category labels in categorization (e.g., Gelman & Heyman, 1999;Yamauchi & Yu, 2008), the control to a category label has often been a property label, not the absence of a label. While property labels and descriptions of entities clearly lack the inferential potency of category labels, these results suggest that they still have some ability to promote role-governed categories (consistent with Yamauchi & Yu, 2008). Common labels invite comparison of the entities being labeled, promoting abstraction and generalization (Gentner, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labeling the properties of entities has a smaller influence on category coherence, property projection, and forming abstractions than does labeling the entity (Gelman & Heyman, 1999;Yamauchi, 2005;Yamauchi & Yu, 2008).…”
Section: Factors That Promote Role-governed Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations