2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00307-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Category size effects in semantic and letter fluency in Alzheimer’s patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
2
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
30
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an account might partly explain the impact of age and c o r t e x x x x ( 2 0 0 8 ) 1 -9 dementia on fluency in these subcategories. Diaz et al (2004) reported a similar relationship between subcategory size and fluency for three subcategories (animals, fruits and vegetables) in AD patients. The current study confirms and extends this finding by showing that this phenomenon does not extend to nonliving subcategories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Such an account might partly explain the impact of age and c o r t e x x x x ( 2 0 0 8 ) 1 -9 dementia on fluency in these subcategories. Diaz et al (2004) reported a similar relationship between subcategory size and fluency for three subcategories (animals, fruits and vegetables) in AD patients. The current study confirms and extends this finding by showing that this phenomenon does not extend to nonliving subcategories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In consequence, a large category could spuriously appear as a better screening tool than a smaller one just because of its size. In fact, it has been shown that patients with DAT seem to have a greater fluency deficit in larger categories [43]. Although a detailed consideration of the category size factor is outside the scope of this paper, a few comments seem to be in order.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the commonest category fluency tests is the one minute animal naming task, wherein a subject is asked to name as many animals as possible in the allotted time. Animal naming is well developed for use in children and adults, routinely applied, and is sensitive to early cognitive changes in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's disease (AD); it has been adapted as part part of the Neuropsychology Battery of the Uniform Data Set designed by the National Institute of Health, see, e.g., Caramelli et al (2007), Gomez and White (2006), Kramer et al (2006), Canning et al (2004), Morris et al (2006), Sauzeon et al (2004), Tombaugh et al (1999), Diaz et al (2003) and Weiner et al (2008).…”
Section: Category Fluency Tests (Cft)mentioning
confidence: 99%