1994
DOI: 10.1080/09602019408401461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Category specificity in the naming of natural and man-made objects: Normative data from adults and children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
41
2
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
41
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies both with healthy participants and with patients have proposed an interaction between domain and sex of participants on picture naming tasks: men showing a better performance with some nonliving subcategories -generally, tools -and women with some living subcategories -commonly, fruits and vegetables (Barbarotto et al, 2002;Capitani et al, 1999;Laiacona et al, 1998;Laws, 1999Laws, , 2004McKenna and Parry, 1994). Overall, our results revealed no significant sex differences in the ability to generate items; however, some intriguing sex differences emerged across age groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 32%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies both with healthy participants and with patients have proposed an interaction between domain and sex of participants on picture naming tasks: men showing a better performance with some nonliving subcategories -generally, tools -and women with some living subcategories -commonly, fruits and vegetables (Barbarotto et al, 2002;Capitani et al, 1999;Laiacona et al, 1998;Laws, 1999Laws, , 2004McKenna and Parry, 1994). Overall, our results revealed no significant sex differences in the ability to generate items; however, some intriguing sex differences emerged across age groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 32%
“…Laws, 1999Laws, , 2004. This has led some authors to propose the existence of a sex specialization in the processing of some semantic subcategories (Barbarotto et al, 2002;Capitani et al, 1999;Laiacona et al, 2005;Laws, 1999Laws, , 2004McKenna and Parry, 1994;Moreno-Martínez et al, 2007). Nevertheless, in a large fluency study, Marra et al (2007) reported better furniture fluency in elderly females and female AD patients, and better bird fluency in elderly males, but not in male AD patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of a considerable category effect in neurologically normal participants may well have been "hidden" by ceiling effects in the control data of previous studies. Indeed, the presence of a normal category advantage (whether living or nonliving) accords with recent findings in healthy participants (Brousseau & Buchanan, 2004;Coppens & Frisinger, 2005;Filliter, McMullen, & Westwood, 2004;Låg, 2005;Låg, Hveem, Ruud, & Laeng, 2006;Laws, 1999Laws, , 2000Laws & Hunter, 2006;Laws & Neve, 1999;Laws, Leeson, & Gale, 2002b;Lloyd-Jones & Luckhurst, 2002;McKenna & Parry, 1994). With the recent accumulation of studies documenting category effects in healthy participants, it is pertinent to ask whether, and indeed how, extant models of category specificity incorporate the notion of category effects in the healthy brain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…These asymmetries are documented by a sizable body of data, obtained both in normal subjects and in brain-damaged patients. For instance, significant gender-related asymmetries about these categories have been observed in normal subjects gathering normative naming data from adults and children [15,32], evaluating familiarity ratings for various categories [1] and studying the age of acquisition of common names [3,15]. Similar asymmetries have been found on speed-ed naming [26] and identification [27] tasks, on name generation tasks [29], on semantic fluency tasks [7,8,31], on object decision tasks [4] and using the semantic priming paradigm [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%