Pilot Society and the Energy Transition 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-61184-2_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catering for Socio-technical Transformations: Rethinking Technology Policy for Inclusive Transformation

Abstract: This chapter zooms out from looking at concrete pilot projects to looking more broadly at the implications of discussions on pilot projects as sites of politics. We discuss how such a perspective might feed into the work of innovators, funding bodies and the making of broader technology policy agendas. The chapter highlights the great potential in pilot projects as a mode of innovation for energy transitions, but bring to the fore the way such innovation activities often take on traditional and technology-cent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While space for theoretically-focused work within SSH must be protected, we agree with the principle that scienceincluding SSHshould benefit society. An important task for SSH researchers it thus to influence Horizon Europe in mainstreaming alternative models of innovation (Ryghaug & Skjølsvold, 2021) and to ensure that EU funding criteria are reformed on this basis. One such alternative is focusing more on social innovation (Wittmayer et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While space for theoretically-focused work within SSH must be protected, we agree with the principle that scienceincluding SSHshould benefit society. An important task for SSH researchers it thus to influence Horizon Europe in mainstreaming alternative models of innovation (Ryghaug & Skjølsvold, 2021) and to ensure that EU funding criteria are reformed on this basis. One such alternative is focusing more on social innovation (Wittmayer et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%