2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catheter ablation in children and patients with congenital heart disease: Review of 1021 procedures at a high-volume single center in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the adult population, similar recurrence rates have been reported in RMN and MAN ablation, which were also comparable between these two techniques, corresponding with the current study’s findings [19] , [20] . Recently published large European and Japanese pediatric CA registries, including primarily manual-guided RF and few cryoablation procedures, reported much higher 12-month recurrence rates compared to our findings, for AVNRT as well as for AVRT ablation [2] , [3] . Moreover, a higher recurrence rate in cryoablation compared to non-irrigated RF ablation was also observed in one of these registries, whereas the other did no comparison between energy sources [2] , [3] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the adult population, similar recurrence rates have been reported in RMN and MAN ablation, which were also comparable between these two techniques, corresponding with the current study’s findings [19] , [20] . Recently published large European and Japanese pediatric CA registries, including primarily manual-guided RF and few cryoablation procedures, reported much higher 12-month recurrence rates compared to our findings, for AVNRT as well as for AVRT ablation [2] , [3] . Moreover, a higher recurrence rate in cryoablation compared to non-irrigated RF ablation was also observed in one of these registries, whereas the other did no comparison between energy sources [2] , [3] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Recently published large European and Japanese pediatric CA registries, including primarily manual-guided RF and few cryoablation procedures, reported much higher 12-month recurrence rates compared to our findings, for AVNRT as well as for AVRT ablation [2] , [3] . Moreover, a higher recurrence rate in cryoablation compared to non-irrigated RF ablation was also observed in one of these registries, whereas the other did no comparison between energy sources [2] , [3] . Theoretically, the observed differences between cryoablation and RF ablation could be caused by either energy source, catheter stability and/or (mis)identification of the right target.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
See 3 more Smart Citations