2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccep.2015.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Should Be Offered as Primary Therapy: What’s Your Hurry?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prophylactic PVI in patients with only typical AFL must be well‐validated before it is introduced into clinical practice. The sequential ablation approach has clinically less expected risk, and there appears to be no compelling reason to adopt a combined ablation approach into standard practice …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prophylactic PVI in patients with only typical AFL must be well‐validated before it is introduced into clinical practice. The sequential ablation approach has clinically less expected risk, and there appears to be no compelling reason to adopt a combined ablation approach into standard practice …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of ongoing CABANA and EAST trials are not expected until 2018 or 2019. In the meanwhile do we really need to be in a hurry for ablation procedure with the intention of preventing atrial structural remodeling without randomized evidence? 36 On the other side, one wonders if the results of the CABANA and EAST trials will really change the clinical practice, even if the results are negative?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%