2018
DOI: 10.7326/m18-0992
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
74
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Two other trials did not observe significant increases in ejection fraction with the pre‐specified imaging methods of primary interest. The meta‐analyses also reported nominally significant decreases in the risk of death or hospitalization for heart failure, but these results were driven almost entirely by the findings of one trial that had significant shortcomings in randomization, in the integrity of follow‐up and in the completeness of the intention‐to‐treat analyses . Despite favourable conclusions by the authors, the findings of the meta‐analyses are fragile and inconclusive.…”
Section: Catheter Ablation For Atrial Fibrillation In Chronic Heart Fmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two other trials did not observe significant increases in ejection fraction with the pre‐specified imaging methods of primary interest. The meta‐analyses also reported nominally significant decreases in the risk of death or hospitalization for heart failure, but these results were driven almost entirely by the findings of one trial that had significant shortcomings in randomization, in the integrity of follow‐up and in the completeness of the intention‐to‐treat analyses . Despite favourable conclusions by the authors, the findings of the meta‐analyses are fragile and inconclusive.…”
Section: Catheter Ablation For Atrial Fibrillation In Chronic Heart Fmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Despite the heterogeneity of the designs and sparseness of the data, the six trials have been combined in numerous meta‐analyses . The most recent of these studies noted an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction across the trials, but with significant heterogeneity, thus undermining the assumptions that would allow pooling of results. Measurements were largely made by echocardiography, which is an unreliable method in patients with atrial fibrillation.…”
Section: Catheter Ablation For Atrial Fibrillation In Chronic Heart Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 These guidelines are based on a handful of trials overall showing improved LVEF and long-term clinical outcomes with catheter ablation of AF in HFrEF patients compared with sole rate or rhythm control. 8 These results are somewhat unsurprising, given that AF is the most common cause of tachyarrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy, and that even short runs of tachycardic AF can trigger an acute decompensation in patients with an already compromised systolic function. 14 In the long run, persistent AF can chronically worsen LVEF, a phenomenon that seems to occur even with normal heart rates, likely due to asynchrony and irregular heart rhythm.…”
Section: Clinical Benefits Of Catheter Ablation Over Rate Control Strmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) frequently coexist due to shared risk factors and pathophysiology. Catheter ablation of AF in patients with HF improves quality of life, left ventricular ejection fraction, and survival compared to pharmacologic rhythm control . Despite its benefits, catheter ablation is an invasive procedure with a small, but measurable risk of major adverse events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%