2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cathinones in urine samples: A review of recent advances for their determination by chromatographic and related techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Urine is the most commonly applied biological matrix likely due to the fact that the procedure is less invasive, samples can be easily collected, and sample volumes are usually larger than other matrices. However, adulteration of the urine may produce false-negative results [77]. Although the sample collection is invasive and needs medically trained staffs and requires appropriate conditions to be stable, blood (plasma, serum) is undoubtedly still widely applied in the analysis of BUP, MTD and their metabolites due to its relatively homogeneous matrix and detectable unchanged substance [78][79][80].…”
Section: Biological Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Urine is the most commonly applied biological matrix likely due to the fact that the procedure is less invasive, samples can be easily collected, and sample volumes are usually larger than other matrices. However, adulteration of the urine may produce false-negative results [77]. Although the sample collection is invasive and needs medically trained staffs and requires appropriate conditions to be stable, blood (plasma, serum) is undoubtedly still widely applied in the analysis of BUP, MTD and their metabolites due to its relatively homogeneous matrix and detectable unchanged substance [78][79][80].…”
Section: Biological Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rapid and automatable method is a potential tool for routine quantification of BUP and its metabolites. Nevertheless, the most commonly employed sample pretreatment for the monitoring of BUP, MTD and their metabolites in biological matrices are liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) [18][19][20][21][22][23]26,40,47,49,50,[52][53][54]56,60,61,63,65,68,69,71,74,76,77,80,[88][89][90][91][92] and solid-phase extraction (SPE) [7,24,28,38,41,[43][44][45][46]48,55,68,72,73,75,[93][94][95]. The major benefits of LLE are its simplicity a...…”
Section: Sample Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urine is one of the most widely used biological matrices in forensic toxicology, for it can be obtained in a large volume through non-invasive procedures and has a longer detection window compared to blood. 9,10 Urine is also commonly utilized in anti-obesity drug testing since it contains both the drug itself and its metabolites. [11][12][13] Additionally, the concentration of anti-obesity drugs in urine remains signicantly higher than in plasma and oral uids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample pretreatment is one of the most important steps in trace analysis, which aims to enrich target substances and eliminate matrix interferences prior to instrumental analysis [1]. At present, the reported methods with regard to the pretreatment of water-based biological samples involve LLE, dispersed liquid-liquid micro-extraction (DLLME), SPE, SPME, magnetic SPE, and others [2][3][4]. Among them, SPE is the preferred approach due to its several advantages such as the good effect of matrix removal, a high recovery rate of the target analyte, and simplicity of operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%