1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(99)00021-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cathodic stripping voltammetry of thiosulphate at toxic concentrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, a separation and preconcentration step is necessary especially for UV-Vis spectrophotometry with low sensitivity, in which the thiosulfate levels of samples are lower than detection limit of spectrophotometry as detection tool. In order to determine low contents of thiosulfate of real samples, the traditional separation and preconcentration procedures such as SPE [17], sweeping, which is based on in-line and online preconcentration of neutral and charge analytes in capillary and/or microchips or which is based on partition of the analytes between pseudo-stationary phase and the surrounding phase what promotes separation of analytes from matrix in MEKC [18,19], solvent extraction [20], electrosorption before detection by cathodic stripping differential pulse voltammetry (CS-DPV) at pH 4.4 [21], electrochemical accumulation on a miniaturized modified mercury drop electrode before detection by cathodic stripping voltammetry (CSV) [22], electrochemical deposition before detection by linear sweeping voltammetry (LSV) in a study, which is based on anodic depolarization reaction between sulfur and the mercury electrode at pH 8.3 [23] as well as column-switching separation/preconcentration before analysis by suppressed IC [24] have been used. But these preconcentration procedures have generally limitations such as time-consuming and cumbersome to perform, utility of columns with a narrow internal diameter limiting the flow rates to a range of 1-10 mL min −1 , so as to large trace-enrichment time for large sample volumes, plugging the cartridge of samples with particulate matter, unsatisfactory enrichment factors, using toxic organic solvents, forming secondary waste for extraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, a separation and preconcentration step is necessary especially for UV-Vis spectrophotometry with low sensitivity, in which the thiosulfate levels of samples are lower than detection limit of spectrophotometry as detection tool. In order to determine low contents of thiosulfate of real samples, the traditional separation and preconcentration procedures such as SPE [17], sweeping, which is based on in-line and online preconcentration of neutral and charge analytes in capillary and/or microchips or which is based on partition of the analytes between pseudo-stationary phase and the surrounding phase what promotes separation of analytes from matrix in MEKC [18,19], solvent extraction [20], electrosorption before detection by cathodic stripping differential pulse voltammetry (CS-DPV) at pH 4.4 [21], electrochemical accumulation on a miniaturized modified mercury drop electrode before detection by cathodic stripping voltammetry (CSV) [22], electrochemical deposition before detection by linear sweeping voltammetry (LSV) in a study, which is based on anodic depolarization reaction between sulfur and the mercury electrode at pH 8.3 [23] as well as column-switching separation/preconcentration before analysis by suppressed IC [24] have been used. But these preconcentration procedures have generally limitations such as time-consuming and cumbersome to perform, utility of columns with a narrow internal diameter limiting the flow rates to a range of 1-10 mL min −1 , so as to large trace-enrichment time for large sample volumes, plugging the cartridge of samples with particulate matter, unsatisfactory enrichment factors, using toxic organic solvents, forming secondary waste for extraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of thiosulfate has also been made through kinetic measurements based on costly equipment, such as stopped-flow [30] and cathodic-stripping voltammetry [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%