2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.03.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cation binding properties of an anionic gemini surfactant monolayer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The derived experimental data were explained in terms of a new model based on the Frumkin adsorption isotherm and the Ward-Tordai diffusion, which allowed us to explain the surfactants surface active behavior at the initial stages of the dynamic adsorption process at the air-water interface in terms of a cooperative adsorption process, in contrast to many previous works 21,22,27,50,60,61 . In addition, positive values of lateral interactions indicate a high stability of the surfactant monolayer formed at the interface [62][63][64][65] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derived experimental data were explained in terms of a new model based on the Frumkin adsorption isotherm and the Ward-Tordai diffusion, which allowed us to explain the surfactants surface active behavior at the initial stages of the dynamic adsorption process at the air-water interface in terms of a cooperative adsorption process, in contrast to many previous works 21,22,27,50,60,61 . In addition, positive values of lateral interactions indicate a high stability of the surfactant monolayer formed at the interface [62][63][64][65] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The newly developed anionic gemini surfactants of the N, N, N′, N′‐dialkyl‐N, N′‐diacetate ethylenediamine family, dubbed Ace(n)‐m‐Ace(n) in the literature, have demonstrated the ability to associate with inorganic metal ions in bulk solution and in monolayer films at the air–water interface (Lv et al, 2014; Lv and Qiao, 2015; Rehman et al, 2017a; Wattebled and Laschewsky, 2007). A representative example of these compounds, Ace(18)‐2‐Ace(18), is shown in Scheme 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, a monomeric surfactant reference compound, sodium laurate, precipitated out of solution at ion concentrations that were several orders of magnitude lower. Research on ion association in our group has focused on Langmuir and Langmuir Blodgett (LB) monolayers in which we reported on the effect of subphase Na + and Ca 2+ on Ace(12)‐2‐Ace(12) monolayer properties, including basic pressure area (π‐A) isotherm characteristics as well as film structure at air–water and air–solid interfaces (Rehman et al, 2017a). The presence of either cation in the subphase resulted in the significant expansion of the monolayer film in comparison with an ion‐free subphase, with Ca 2+ inducing a greater film expansion than Na + .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have focused on the synthesis of Gemini surfactants with diamine as the spacer and carboxylate as the headgroup in the same molecule (Lv et al, ; Onitsuka et al, ). Some Gemini surfactants possess amide groups between the hydrocarbon chain and the carboxyl headgroup (Kunieda et al, ; Rehman et al, ; Tsubone et al, ; Yoshimura and Esumi, ). These Gemini surfactants are able to achieve lower surface tensions in smaller critical micelle concentrations comparing with the corresponding monomeric surfactants, while having better wetting, emulsifying and foam properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%