2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-022-05091-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cattle access to small streams increases concentrations of Escherichia coli in bed sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trends in concentrations along the creek were not significant on many sampling dates. Such trends were expected due to substantial differences in land use among the sampling sites, as the animal and human waste management in different land use settings can strongly affect FIB concentrations (Antunes et al., 2022; Frak, 2013; Haack et al., 2016; Thilakarathne et al., 2018). It appears that more samples may be needed to reveal such differences for individual sampling dates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trends in concentrations along the creek were not significant on many sampling dates. Such trends were expected due to substantial differences in land use among the sampling sites, as the animal and human waste management in different land use settings can strongly affect FIB concentrations (Antunes et al., 2022; Frak, 2013; Haack et al., 2016; Thilakarathne et al., 2018). It appears that more samples may be needed to reveal such differences for individual sampling dates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Temporal variation appears to be another factor that controls levels of indicator concentrations and can affect the assessment of the role of sediment in microbial water quality formation. Seasonality in FIB sediment concentrations has been noted (Soupir & Pandey, 2016; Bragina et al., 2017; Stocker et al., 2019; Antunes et al., 2022), but the finer scales of temporal variability have not been explored except for times immediately before and after high‐flow events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The persistence of FIOs in bed sediments has been linked to other factors, such as availability of nutrients [ 17 ], sediment characteristics [ 14 , 18 ], and protection from ultraviolet radiation and predative organisms [ 19 ]. FIOs in streambed sediment can also regrow under some favourable conditions [ 20 , 21 ], thus providing a potentially long-term input into the overlying water column [ 22 ]. Association of FIOs with organic and/or mineral matter can play an important role in their delivery to streambed sediment relative to freely suspended cells because of the impact on increased settling speeds [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cattle access to streams has been linked with increases in levels of deposited sediment and habitat homogenisation (Herbst et al, 2012), hydromorphological changes (Belsky et al, 1999), degraded riparian conditions (Grudzinski et al, 2016), physico‐chemical degradation (Arnaiz et al, 2011), alterations in biological communities such as aquatic macroinvertebrates (Braccia & Voshell, 2007; Conroy, Turner, Rymszewicz, O'sullivan, et al, 2016) and increases in sediment concentrations of Escherichia coli (Antunes et al, 2023; Bragina et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…chemical degradation (Arnaiz et al, 2011), alterations in biological communities such as aquatic macroinvertebrates (Braccia & Voshell, 2007;Conroy, Turner, Rymszewicz, O'sullivan, et al, 2016) and increases in sediment concentrations of Escherichia coli (Antunes et al, 2023;Bragina et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%