2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.94.s1.12.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cattle and sheep farms as reservoirs ofCampylobacter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
195
3
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
10
195
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, strains 3C and 6C were isolated from the same country region (Lubelskie voivodship) and at the same time but belong to different clonal groups -I and III, respectively. Previous studies have also shown that several Campylobacter genotypes can coexist among individual chickens (Schouls et al 2003) and that individual farms can be contaminated with multiple clones (Stanley and Jones 2003;Rivoal et al 2005).…”
Section: Mrp By Pfge Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, strains 3C and 6C were isolated from the same country region (Lubelskie voivodship) and at the same time but belong to different clonal groups -I and III, respectively. Previous studies have also shown that several Campylobacter genotypes can coexist among individual chickens (Schouls et al 2003) and that individual farms can be contaminated with multiple clones (Stanley and Jones 2003;Rivoal et al 2005).…”
Section: Mrp By Pfge Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and assists in keeping this agent, since grow best in environments where temperatures around 42 °C (HORROCKS et al, 2008). Stern and Ro Bach (2003) evaluated the presence of Campylobacter spp. in broiler carcasses in North Georgia, and compared the results obtained in 1995 and 2001, obtaining a lower bacterial count in the collections of 2001, which was attributed to the implementation of the Hazard Analysis System and Critical Control industry (HACCP ).…”
Section: Campylobacter In Broiler Carcassesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…isolation from the fecal and bile samples of ruminants in these reports are relatively high, i.e., 4%-91% from fecal samples and 16%-97% from bile samples. Variables such as herd size; type, season, and age of the animal; sample site; sample frequency; isolation method; geography; and diet and husbandry practices have been suggested as reasons for the differences in rates of isolation [14,24,25]. Our present data demonstrated that only 1.6% of the caecum samples and 1.0% of the bile samples from the buffaloes were positive for C. jejuni and C. fetus; no Campylobacter spp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%