2007
DOI: 10.4310/ajm.2007.v11.n1.a6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cauchy integrals and Möbius geometry of curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…* are parabolas that don't intersect as subsets of D. Their Kerzman-Stein distance is defined to be the angle of intersection of two new parabolas constructed using only the corresponding support line elements [1]. The parabola p 12 is tangent to the first line element at the first point and passes through the second point; the parabola p 21 is tangent to the second line element at the second point and passes through the first point.…”
Section: Vertical Parabolas and Laguerre Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…* are parabolas that don't intersect as subsets of D. Their Kerzman-Stein distance is defined to be the angle of intersection of two new parabolas constructed using only the corresponding support line elements [1]. The parabola p 12 is tangent to the first line element at the first point and passes through the second point; the parabola p 21 is tangent to the second line element at the second point and passes through the first point.…”
Section: Vertical Parabolas and Laguerre Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Their appearance in Theorem 2 refers to their values on the osculating parabolas at the endpoints.) In earlier work, the authors used these distances to provide estimates for certain Möbius invariant operators that include the Cauchy transform and Kerzman-Stein operator [1]. In §6 we pursue analogous results for invariant operators in D.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(This is for a region with continuously differentiable boundary.) It is classical that C and C 0 are bounded on L 2 (bΩ), so evidently the Kerzman-Stein operator A def = C − C * = C 0 − C * 0 is bounded and can be expressed using (1). Notice that the holomorphic and arc length differentials are related via dw = T (w) ds w .…”
Section: Smooth Regions With Large Kerzman-stein Eigenvaluementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent work on the problem was concerned with giving a complete description of the spectrum for model domains [3], asymptotics of eigenvalues for ellipses with small eccentricity [5], and norm estimates that are invariant with respect to Möbius transformation [1,4]. For a disc or halfplane, there is complete cancellation of singularities and the Kerzman-Stein operator is trivial [13].…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation