1991
DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199103000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cauda Equina Syndrome After Continuous Spinal Anesthesia

Abstract: Four cases of cauda equina syndrome occurring after continuous spinal anesthesia are reported. In all four cases, there was evidence of a focal sensory block and, to achieve adequate analgesia, a dose of local anesthetic was given that was greater than that usually administered with a single-injection technique. We postulate that the combination of maldistribution and a relatively high dose of local anesthetic resulted in neurotoxic injury. Suggestions that may reduce the potential for neurotoxicity are discus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
179
1
11

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 578 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
179
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Although anesthesiologists attribute differential nerve fiber blockade at reversible neural block to differences in nerve fiber diameter, conduction velocity, or surrounding myelination, the real causes remain unclear (Gasser and Erlanger, 1929;Gissen et al, 1980;Fink, 1989). Irreversible neural injury caused by high concentrations of local anesthetic in spinal anesthesia has become a serious problem over the past 15 years, and the underlying mechanisms are likewise unknown (Rigler et al, 1991;Drasner et al, 1994;Sakura et al, 1995a,b). If the application of the Neurometer in an animal model can be shown to be useful, large amounts of information regarding the mechanisms of differential nerve blocking and neurotoxicity induced by local anesthetics will become available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although anesthesiologists attribute differential nerve fiber blockade at reversible neural block to differences in nerve fiber diameter, conduction velocity, or surrounding myelination, the real causes remain unclear (Gasser and Erlanger, 1929;Gissen et al, 1980;Fink, 1989). Irreversible neural injury caused by high concentrations of local anesthetic in spinal anesthesia has become a serious problem over the past 15 years, and the underlying mechanisms are likewise unknown (Rigler et al, 1991;Drasner et al, 1994;Sakura et al, 1995a,b). If the application of the Neurometer in an animal model can be shown to be useful, large amounts of information regarding the mechanisms of differential nerve blocking and neurotoxicity induced by local anesthetics will become available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The toxicity levels of three drugs were similar in their studies, different from the present experiments. It is not clear whether continuous infusion using a pump promoted maldistribution of the local anesthetics, for example, accumulation in the cauda equina region 24 leading to high concentrations in this region which hampered the assessment of the differences in toxicity levels among the injected local anesthetics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review of its use in obstetrical anesthesia 12 reflects the long history of using this technique and how it had become obsolete after the report of severe neurologic sequelae. 13 Although it was postulated that these complications were caused by the use of high-concentration local anesthetics through small-calibre microcatheters, the reluctance to place larger catheters intrathecally still exists secondary to the high incidence of PDPH. 14 Nevertheless, Palmer 12 suggests specific clinical circumstances in which the use of intrathecal catheters is warranted, including challenging epidural catheter placement and a difficult airway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%