During the anterior−posterior fate specification of insects, anterior fates arise in a nonelongating tissue (called the "blastoderm"), and posterior fates arise in an elongating tissue (called the "germband"). However, insects differ widely in the extent to which anterior−posterior fates are specified in the blastoderm versus the germband. Here we present a model in which patterning in both the blastoderm and germband of the beetle Tribolium castaneum is based on the same flexible mechanism: a gradient that modulates the speed of a genetic cascade of gap genes, resulting in the induction of sequential kinematic waves of gap gene expression. The mechanism is flexible and capable of patterning both elongating and nonelongating tissues, and hence converting blastodermal to germband fates and vice versa. Using RNAi perturbations, we found that blastodermal fates could be shifted to the germband, and germband fates could be generated in a blastoderm-like morphology. We also suggest a molecular mechanism underlying our model, in which gradient levels regulate the switch between two enhancers: One enhancer is responsible for sequential gene activation, and the other is responsible for freezing temporal rhythms into spatial patterns. This model is consistent with findings in Drosophila melanogaster, where gap genes were found to be regulated by two nonredundant "shadow" enhancers.clock-and-wavefront | evolution | kinematic waves | cascade | enhancer switching R hythmic and sequential gene activity has been implicated in the spatial patterning of many embryonic structures. For example, a molecular clock mediates stripes of gene expression that delimit vertebrate somites (1-3), segments in short-germ arthropods (4-10), and lateral roots in plants (11,12). Aperiodic sequential activation of genes regulates the spatial patterning of Drosophila neuroblasts (13, 14) and the vertebrate neural tube (15). However, different strategies are used in each case to translate a temporal process into a spatial one. Two main mechanisms have been described: (i) one based on the continuous retraction of a steep gradient or boundary (usually called a "wavefront") and (ii) the other based on a static or nonretracting gradient. The "clock-and-wavefront" model exemplifies the first type, and was originally proposed in the context of vertebrate somitogenesis (16). In this model, an arrest front sweeps the tissue and freezes oscillations of a molecular clock into stripes. The "spatial and temporal gradient" model exemplifies the latter, which was proposed in the context of vertebrate neural tube development (15,(17)(18)(19). In this model, the concentration of and exposure time to a more or less static (nonretracting) gradient regulates the sequential activation of genes.Models that use a wavefront (henceforth called "wavefrontbased" models) are best suited for patterning elongating tissues, since axial elongation offers a natural mechanism for continuous and sustained gradient retraction. On the other hand, models that use a static gradient (he...