2004
DOI: 10.1080/0969229042000279793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caught between state-sovereign rights and property rights: regulating biodiversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New research demonstrates the urgent need for effective approaches to commons problems that are global in scale (E. Ostrom et al 1999). Particular areas of focus on the global commons in this bibliography are biodiversity (Choudry 2005;Coban 2004;Goeschl and Igliori 2006;Tisdell 2004;Trommetter 2005) and water resources (Becker and Easter 1999;Dilworth 2007;Dinar 2000;Fisher 2004;Smets 2004).…”
Section: Notes On the Bibliographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New research demonstrates the urgent need for effective approaches to commons problems that are global in scale (E. Ostrom et al 1999). Particular areas of focus on the global commons in this bibliography are biodiversity (Choudry 2005;Coban 2004;Goeschl and Igliori 2006;Tisdell 2004;Trommetter 2005) and water resources (Becker and Easter 1999;Dilworth 2007;Dinar 2000;Fisher 2004;Smets 2004).…”
Section: Notes On the Bibliographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, while both chemical elements of the periodic table and genes exist in nature, they are classified differently under the patent law: the former as discovery and deemed non-patentable whereas the latter is conveniently designated as invention and deemed to be patentable. The distinction between discovery and invention is thus blurred in order to facilitate the biotechnology industry since otherwise germplasm would be considered to be a discovery and patent claims over it would be rejected (Çoban 2004). Such lacuna facilitates broad patent claims in countries like America.…”
Section: Trips and The Patenting Of Bioresources And Associated Tradimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although TRIPS permits exceptions to patenting on the grounds of public order and morality (i.e., threats to health, life and environment), the clause is ambiguous and often misconstrued to suit the interests of private corporations (Çoban 2004). The clause cannot be enforced and is left to the discretion of patent offices that may avoid impact studies.…”
Section: Trips and The Patenting Of Bioresources And Associated Tradimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New research demonstrates the urgent need for effective approaches to commons problems that are global in scale (E. Ostrom et al 1999). Particular areas of focus on the global commons in this bibliography are biodiversity (Choudry 2005;Coban 2004;Goeschl and Igliori 2006;Tisdell 2004;Trommetter 2005) and water resources (Becker and Easter 1999;Dilworth 2007;Dinar 2000;Fisher 2004;Smets 2004).…”
Section: Notes On the Bibliographymentioning
confidence: 99%