Caught in the middle: Accommodative dilemmas in police–community relations.

Abstract

Police reform movements often focus on improving relationships between police and the public. These relationships are a primary focus of community policing and procedural justice, two major reform efforts in policing worldwide over the past 3 decades. Reform movements that seek to improve relationships between police and the public rely, in part, on improving the way police communicate with the public. The idea of altering the style and content of communication to improve trust and reduce tension and conflict is consistent with a framework called communication accommodation theory that has appealed to a wide variety of disciplines. Although communication accommodation is implicit in many efforts to reform the police, little attention has been paid to the realistic constraints that police leaders may face in seeking to accommodate members of the public or their own employees. There are times when police leaders face “accommodative dilemmas” in which choosing to accommodate an outgroup means either not accommodating, or underaccommodating one’s own ingroup, and vice versa. Drawing on the study of intergroup communication, this article illustrates and discusses these accommodative dilemmas in police–community relations.

A Toolkit for Community-Police Dialogue

“…5 Moreover, intergroup contact has also been discussed as a factor in biased policing, 6 as well as a key element in reconciling with collective trauma, 7 for improving antibias training, 8 and for improving police legitimacy. 9 Recent research on dialoguebased approaches to intergroup contact between police and community members has shown some evidence of promise as well, 10 but much of the work in this area is still developing.…”