2023
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1258015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causal associations between schizophrenia and cancers risk: a Mendelian randomization study

Kai Zhou,
Lin Zhu,
Nian Chen
et al.

Abstract: BackgroundPrevious observational studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding the incidence of cancer in patients with schizophrenia compared to the general population. The causal relationship between schizophrenia and cancer remains unclear and requires further investigation.ObjectiveTo investigate the causal relationship between schizophrenia and cancer.MethodsIn this study, a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted using publicly available genome-wide association studies to d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This update prompts a reevaluation of the validity of the conclusions drawn in the article by Zhou et al. ( 1 ) regarding these types of cancer, as well as considering the possibility that alternative findings may arise upon replacement of the revised data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This update prompts a reevaluation of the validity of the conclusions drawn in the article by Zhou et al. ( 1 ) regarding these types of cancer, as well as considering the possibility that alternative findings may arise upon replacement of the revised data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the population included in the Cancer-related outcomes section of Zhou et al. ( 1 ) consists solely of individuals of European ancestry. The presence of diverse ethnicities in the exposure and outcome populations may introduce population stratification bias, potentially impacting the robustness of the study’s conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations