W hen it comes to character, narrative theory has long been at odds with ordinary experiences of fiction reading. Characters, says the formalist or poststructuralist theorist, are nonhuman word-masses, existents, actants, narrative-men, Nobodies, or the products of semes traversing proper names. 1 Yet readers persist in regarding characters as more human than "substantial hypothetical beings," more like friends or neighbors than E. M. Forster's species Homo Fictus allows. 2 This tendency shows every time regular readers talk about fictional characters, and there's really nothing that narrative theory can do to stop it. Instead we ignore it. Narrative theorists have chosen functional, thematic, and linguistic approaches to character over the analysis of readers' reports of self-recognition in fictional characters, or what might be described as naïve engagement with readily identifiable character types. 3 This work rarely reckons with the behavior and beliefs of ordinary readers of fiction, though it implies effects on ideal audiences. 4 For instance, in cognitive narratology, recent work on modes for representation of fictional consciousness contributes to models of narrative communication and accounts of human mind-reading ability, though the experiences of actual readers remain in the black box. 5 Common readerly practices such as liking and hating characters, connecting with or distrusting characters, have been relegated to the book group or the blog, if they are discussed at all. These ubiquitous means of engaging with narrative fiction deserve attention. This essay calls for a revival of reader-response studies, informed by evidence of the high degree of variability in reactions to fictional characters.In an historical moment where reading overall and fiction reading in particular suffers precipitous declines, 6 attention to what the remaining ordinary readers do with and to fictional characters could then change the direction of theoretical engagement with "character." Rather than increasing the distance between theorizing about fiction reading and the experiences of actual readers, we acknowledge the shaping influence of readers on character. This influence includes aspects of identity such as gender and class. Feminist standpoint theory suggests that personal identity influences all aspects of scholarly work, including