Probabilities, Causes and Propensities in Physics 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9904-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causal Completeness in General Probability Theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first is to switch to the more general context of random variables, as opposed to events. Initial steps in this direction have been taken in Gyenis & Rédei [2010]. The second would be to attempt to transfer the results to non-classical probability spaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is to switch to the more general context of random variables, as opposed to events. Initial steps in this direction have been taken in Gyenis & Rédei [2010]. The second would be to attempt to transfer the results to non-classical probability spaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both common cause complete and common cause incomplete probability spaces exist: It was shown in [3]) (also see [4] and [10][Chapter 4]) that no classical probability space with a Boolean algebra of finite cardinality can be common cause complete and that a dense classical probability space is common cause closed. The converse is not true, a classical probability space can be not purely nonatomic and still common cause closed; in fact, common cause closedness of classical probability spaces can be characterized completely: a classical probability space is common cause closed if and only if it has at most one measure theoretic atom [5].…”
Section: Definition 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 The last option would be to move the discussion to the more general context of random variables, as opposed to events. First steps in this direction have been provided by Gyenis and Rédei (2010).…”
Section: Conclusion and Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%