2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02152-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causal effects of atrial fibrillation on brain white and gray matter volume: a Mendelian randomization study

Abstract: Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) and brain volume loss are prevalent in older individuals. We aimed to assess the causal effect of atrial fibrillation on brain volume phenotypes by Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Methods The genetic instrument for AF was constructed from a previous genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis (15,993 AF patients and 113,719 controls of European ancestry). The outcome summary statistics for head-size… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the total causal effect of air pollution on hypertension (from univariable MR) and the direct causal effect (from MVMR) would indicate a mediating role of the common factor. The indirect effect was not calculated because the linear relation between the exposure and outcome, which is required for the estimation of indirect effect, was not secured due to the binary variable of the outcome ( 38 , 39 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the total causal effect of air pollution on hypertension (from univariable MR) and the direct causal effect (from MVMR) would indicate a mediating role of the common factor. The indirect effect was not calculated because the linear relation between the exposure and outcome, which is required for the estimation of indirect effect, was not secured due to the binary variable of the outcome ( 38 , 39 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic IVs linked with exposure (AAM) were collected from the GWAS summary database with a sample size of 218,796 Europeans, and we underwent a variety of quality control procedures in our analysis to choose suitable instrumental SNPs that showed significant relationships with AAM. Firstly, we identified the SNPs based on the genome-wide significance threshold ( p < 5 × 10 −8 ), and then we removed highly correlated variants with 0.001 to avoid linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the range of 10000 KB ( Savage et al, 2018 ; Park et al, 2021a ). All of these SNPs have minor allele frequencies (MAF) over 0.01, indicating a small statistical bias caused by poor confidence ( Chen et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, R 2 represented the proportion of variation of IV explained by SNP, N represented the sample size, and K represented the number of SNPs. F > 10 represented that the possibility of weak instrumental variable bias was relatively low [17,18].…”
Section: Selection Of Ivsmentioning
confidence: 99%