Shifts in climate characteristics, such as precipitation totals, phase, and timing are widely considered to be the dominant drivers of hydrologic change, but land cover changes, consisting of changes in the biological or physical features present in a landscape (e.g., forested or urban area), also have the potential to drive changes in streamflow, potentially even offsetting the influence of climate (Slater, Anderson, et al., 2021). The effects of land cover changes on hydrological extremes, such as worsening flood risk (e.g., Bradshaw et al., 2007; van Dijk et al., 2009), or as potential mechanisms by which hydrological and climatic risks may be managed or offset (e.g., Dadson et al., 2017;Dixon et al., 2016) remain poorly understood. It is clear that land cover changes can alter hydrological response to precipitation events by influencing the degree and rate at which water is intercepted and evaporated, stored, or allowed to run off into a river channel (Filoso et al., 2017;Jacobson, 2011;Shuster et al., 2005), however, the extent to which they do so lacks clear definition.There are a number of ways in which land cover change might be expected to influence the magnitude of high, mean, and low daily streamflows. Widely discussed in the literature, urbanization is typically expected to increase high flows and flood risk (