Causal effects of specific gut microbiota on bone mineral density: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Abstract

BackgroundRecent studies have reported that the gut microbiota is essential for preventing and delaying the progression of osteoporosis. Nonetheless, the causal relationship between the gut microbiota and the risk of osteoporosis has not been fully revealed.MethodsA two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis based on a large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) was conducted to investigate the causal relationship between the gut microbiota and bone mineral density (BMD). Instrumental variables for 211 gut microbiota taxa were obtained from the available GWAS meta-analysis (n = 18,340) conducted by the MiBioGen consortium. The summary-level data for BMD were from the Genetic Factors for Osteoporosis (GEFOS) Consortium, which involved a total of 32,735 individuals of European ancestry. The inverse variance-weighted (IVW) method was performed as a primary analysis to estimate the causal effect, and the robustness of the results was tested via sensitivity analyses by using multiple methods. Finally, a reverse MR analysis was applied to evaluate reverse causality.ResultsAccording to the IVW method, we found that nine, six, and eight genetically predicted gut microbiota were associated with lumbar spine (LS) BMD, forearm (FA) BMD, and femoral neck (FN) BMD, respectively. Among them, the higher genetically predicted Genus Prevotella9 level was correlated with increased LS-BMD [β = 0.125, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.050–0.200, P = 0.001] and FA-BMD (β = 0.129, 95% CI: 0.007–0.251, P = 0.039). The higher level of genetically predicted Family Prevotellaceae was associated with increased FA-BMD (β = 0.154, 95% CI: 0.020–0.288, P = 0.025) and FN-BMD (β = 0.080, 95% CI: 0.015–0.145, P = 0.016). Consistent directional effects for all analyses were observed in both the MR-Egger and weighted median methods. Subsequently, sensitivity analyses revealed no heterogeneity, directional pleiotropy, or outliers for the causal effect of specific gut microbiota on BMD (P > 0.05). In reverse MR analysis, there was no evidence of reverse causality between LS-BMD, FA-BMD, and FN-BMD and gut microbiota (P > 0.05).ConclusionGenetic evidence suggested a causal relationship between the gut microbiota and BMD and identified specific bacterial taxa that regulate bone mass variation. Further exploration of the potential microbiota-related mechanisms of bone metabolism might provide new approaches for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Causal roles of gut microbiota in cholangiocarcinoma etiology suggested by genetic study

“…However, applying a stringent threshold of 5 × 10 -8 would have excluded the majority of these SNPs. Consequently, we opted for a relatively lenient yet still statistically significant threshold of 1 × 10 -05 , as supported by prior studies[ 24 , 25 ]. This threshold was set to encompass most gut microbiota-associated SNPs, ensuring that those with an R 2 < 0.001 and a physical distance (kb) of 10000 were included, thus mitigating linkage disequilibrium (LD).…”

Osteoporosis and coronary heart disease: a bi-directional Mendelian randomization study

“…In order to fortify the reliability of the outcomes derived from MR analysis, a thorough assessment of both heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy was meticulously conducted ( 28 ). Cochran’s Q test estimates, derived from IVW estimates, were used to rule out heterogeneity among IVs ( 29 ). A P value < 0.05 denoted the presence of substantial heterogeneity.…”

Causal associations between gut microbiota and synovitis–tenosynovitis: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

“…Currently, the biggest known symbiotic microbiological communities in humans are the gut microbiota, and this symbiotic relationship plays an important role in human diseases and health ( Shkoporov and Hill, 2019 ; Li et al, 2023 ). The gut microbiota affects the physiology of the host by participating in various biological processes, which include regulating immune function, regulating the oxidative stress response, maintaining anabolic balance, resisting inflammation and infection, and so on ( Adak and Khan, 2019 ; Ticinesi et al, 2019 ; Chen et al, 2023b ). An increasing number of studies have confirmed that gut microbiota dysbiosis is associated with synovitis and tenosynovitis susceptibility and progression.…”