2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep12(2020)055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causal hierarchy in modified gravity

Abstract: We investigate the causal hierarchy in various modified theories of gravity. In general relativity the standard causal hierarchy, (key elements of which are chronology, causality, strong causality, stable causality, and global hyperbolicity), is well-established. In modified theories of gravity there is typically considerable extra structure, (such as: multiple metrics, aether fields, modified dispersion relations, Hořava-like gravity, parabolic propagation, etcetera), requiring a reassessment and rephrasing o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[43]) in non-relativistic JHEP04(2021)255 settings, as well as the generalization to space-times with universal horizons of the theorems concerning vacuum state regularity in globally hyperbolic space-times [47,49,50]. Let us stress that such generalizations are far from clear in the quite contrived causality structure of such geometries [51] and that the possibility to fully characterize the vacuum state is not guaranteed due to the peculiar nature of universal horizons that make them similar to Cauchy horizon in non-relativistic frameworks [10,51]. 14 We hope to be able to tackle these issues and more in forthcoming investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[43]) in non-relativistic JHEP04(2021)255 settings, as well as the generalization to space-times with universal horizons of the theorems concerning vacuum state regularity in globally hyperbolic space-times [47,49,50]. Let us stress that such generalizations are far from clear in the quite contrived causality structure of such geometries [51] and that the possibility to fully characterize the vacuum state is not guaranteed due to the peculiar nature of universal horizons that make them similar to Cauchy horizon in non-relativistic frameworks [10,51]. 14 We hope to be able to tackle these issues and more in forthcoming investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, after the formation of a universal horizon, in order to set up a well-defined Cauchy problem, one needs new extra "initial data" (corresponding to some regularity condition at future timelike infinity i + ). See e.g [51]. for a more detailed discussion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the causal structure of modified gravity theories [36] shows that one must distinguish between frameworks in which all propagating modes have finite signal velocities and frameworks in which at least one propagating mode has an infinite signal velocity. Following the notation in reference [36], we will refer to these two frameworks as Einsteinaether and Hořava-like, respectively. We start by analyzing the former framework which, since all its signal velocities are finite, is closer to general relativity.…”
Section: Trapping Horizons and Modified Dispersion Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the causal structure of modified gravity theories [38] shows that one must distinguish between frameworks in which all propagating modes have finite signal velocities and frameworks in which at least one propagating mode has an infinite signal velocity. Following the notation in reference [38], we will refer to these two frameworks as Einsteinaether and Hořava-like, respectively. We start by analyzing the former framework which, since all its signal velocities are finite, is closer to general relativity.…”
Section: Trapping Horizons and Modified Dispersion Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that N = N (τ, ) has been defined implicitly in Eqs. (37) and (38). The associated null vectors {k, l} are proportional to…”
Section: Specific Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%