Causal Modeling with Feedback Fuzzy Cognitive Maps

Abstract

Fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs) model feedback causal relations in interwoven webs of causality and policy variables. FCMs are fuzzy signed directed graphs that allow degrees of causal influence and event occurrence. Such causal models can simulate a wide range of policy scenarios and decision processes. Their directed loops or cycles directly model causal feedback. Their nonlinear dynamics permit forward-chaining inference from input causes and policy options to output effects. Users can add detailed dynamics and feedback links directly to the causal model or infer them with statistical learning laws. Users can fuse or combine FCMs from multiple experts by weighting and adding the underlying fuzzy edge matrices and do so recursively if needed. The combined FCM tends to better represent domain knowledge as the expert sample size increases if the expert sample approximates a random sample. Many causal models use more restrictive directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) and Bayesian probabilities. DAGs do not model causal feedback because they do not contain closed loops. Combining DAGs also tends to produce cycles and thus tends not to produce a new DAG. Combining DAGs tends to produce a FCM. FCM causal influence is also transitive whereas probabilistic causal influence is not transitive in general. Overall: FCMs trade the numerical precision of probabilistic DAGs for pattern prediction, faster and scalable computation, ease of combination, and richer feedback representation. We show how FCMs can apply to problems of public support for insurgency and terrorism and to US-China conflict relations in Graham Allison's Thucydides-trap framework. The Thucydides-trap FCM predicts war-like conflict for nearly 80% of input scenarios where we treat all such scenarios

A Review of Dataset and Labeling Methods for Causality Extraction

“…(Fu et al,2011;Hashimoto et al2012;Do et al2011;Zhao et al2017;Mirza and Tonelli 2014;Mirza 2014) • Causal network: The network created by the causality events or entities extracted from a large number of corpus texts to improve the accuracy of the model or to be used for specific research. (Kayesh et al, 2019;Paul, 2017;Osoba and Kosko, 2019;Kocaoglu et al, 2017;Nordon et al, 2010;Yeo et al,2018) • Multiple languages causality: In addition to English, there have also been studies on causality extraction in other languages, including Chinese (Fu et al,2011), Japanese (Hashimoto et al, 2012;Hashimoto et al, 2014;Hashimoto et al, 2015), German (Tina et al2014), Arabic (Sadek and Meziane, 2016) ,etc.…”

Influenza epidemic model using dynamic social networks of individuals with cognition maps

“…(4) . This kind of function is particularly useful if when you know the range where x can take values during the inference process [10] thus, the output is not limited to a specific range as with other kinds of threshold functions such as a sigmode [3 , 11] . where , and…”

Systems-thinking for environmental policy coherence: Stakeholder knowledge, fuzzy logic, and causal reasoning

“…These feedbacks may connect to form closed loops, which define the system trajectory as either balancing (i.e., trending toward equilibrium) or reinforcing (i.e., propagating change) (Sternam, 2002). Large CLDs are often too convoluted for practical inference of policy implications from a visual analysis of the many interactive feedbacks within the system (Bureš, 2017;Osoba and Kosko, 2019). System dynamics modeling (SDM) is then the translation of these feedbacks into a quantified model to simulate the associated dynamics, which may be used to test unique hypotheses for robust decision-making (Richmond, 1993).…”