2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP growth revisited: A dynamic panel data approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

20
226
2
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 555 publications
(256 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
20
226
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The smaller long-run and adjustment coefficients of energy consumption compared to real GDP estimated by the present study also give evidence in this direction. Compared with other previous panel data studies on OECD countries, the findings of bi-directional causal relationships contradict, on the one hand, those of Huang et al (2008) who found a uni-directional causal relationship running from economic growth to energy consumption with a negative impact, and, on the other, those of the panel data analysis by Narayan and Smyth (2008) who inferred that energy consumption Granger-causes real GDP positively in the long run. Furthermore, the empirical results of this study also refute the neutrality hypothesis such as all other panel data studies on the energy consumption-growth nexus, except for the sub-analysis by Huang et al (2008) of 19 low income countries.…”
Section: Dynamic Panel Causalitycontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The smaller long-run and adjustment coefficients of energy consumption compared to real GDP estimated by the present study also give evidence in this direction. Compared with other previous panel data studies on OECD countries, the findings of bi-directional causal relationships contradict, on the one hand, those of Huang et al (2008) who found a uni-directional causal relationship running from economic growth to energy consumption with a negative impact, and, on the other, those of the panel data analysis by Narayan and Smyth (2008) who inferred that energy consumption Granger-causes real GDP positively in the long run. Furthermore, the empirical results of this study also refute the neutrality hypothesis such as all other panel data studies on the energy consumption-growth nexus, except for the sub-analysis by Huang et al (2008) of 19 low income countries.…”
Section: Dynamic Panel Causalitycontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, there exists negative relationship between energy consumption and prices. Huang, Hwang, and Yang (2008) investigate the impact of energy consumption on economic growth by dividing datasets into four groups. Hence, in lower income group, they did not find any relationship between energy consumption and economic growth.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the co-integration techniques were also used to estimate long-run relationship between energy consumption and economic growth. Jumbe and Huang have proved bi-directional relationship between energy consumption and economic growth (Jumbe, 2004) (Huang, 2008). Estimation of multi-dimensional relationship has also proved the role of energy in overall economic development (Tamizan, 2009) (Shahbaz, 2012).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%