2017
DOI: 10.1257/pol.20150573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causal Spousal Health Spillover Effects and Implications for Program Evaluation

Abstract: Current methods of cost effectiveness analysis implicitly assume zero spillovers among social ties. This can underestimate the benefits of health interventions and misallocate resources toward interventions with lower comprehensive effects. We discuss the implications of social spillovers for program evaluation and document the first evidence of causal spillovers of health behaviors between spouses by leveraging experimental data from the Lung Health Study (smoking) and COMBINE Study (drinking). We find large … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the discussion below in this subsection, we formally account for the possibility that the exclusion restriction does not hold, employing the method described by Conley, Hansen, and Rossi (2012). In particular, we estimate β 1 under various priors for the influence that the a × w interaction effect might have on Y directly (see also Fletcher and Marksteiner [2017] and Satyanath, Voigtländer, and Voth [2017]). A natural prior is to assume that the age group-weekend night interaction effect is a fraction, δ, of the reduced form parameter π 1 .…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides the discussion below in this subsection, we formally account for the possibility that the exclusion restriction does not hold, employing the method described by Conley, Hansen, and Rossi (2012). In particular, we estimate β 1 under various priors for the influence that the a × w interaction effect might have on Y directly (see also Fletcher and Marksteiner [2017] and Satyanath, Voigtländer, and Voth [2017]). A natural prior is to assume that the age group-weekend night interaction effect is a fraction, δ, of the reduced form parameter π 1 .…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in Fletcher and Marksteiner (2017) among others, we contextualize the restrictions on δ by their percentage on the reduced form parameter π 1 and, in the table, present the results for the case in which δ = 0.50. In the Online Appendix we show the results found for other unions of CI with δ set at 0.20, 0.40, 0.60 and 0.80.…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Al‐Janabi and Van Exel ; Al‐Janabi et al. ; Fletcher and Marksteiner ), current health care cost estimates do not routinely consider potential downstream costs associated with the health care expenditures of family members who care for their seriously ill loved ones (Hurd et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these analyses suggest that assessment of EOL costs may need to account for the downstream costs of health care for spouses. Despite a growing literature demonstrating the evidence to support inclusion of family "health spillovers" in economic evaluation (Bobinac et al 2011;Brouwer et al 2013;Fletcher and Marksteiner 2017), current health care cost estimates do not routinely consider potential downstream costs associated with the health care expenditures of family members who care for their seriously ill loved ones (Hurd et al 2013). A more comprehensive (and less individualistic) perspective on health care and assessment of costs is justified as many caregivers are themselves older, in poor health, and also Medicare beneficiaries (National Academies of Sciences 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Fletcher and Marksteiner (2017) for an application of RCTs to examine health behavior spillovers between spouses. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%