2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.09.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causality assessment of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11 The reporting rate of Green Channel Centre was greater than the mean Italian reporting rate in the same period and, interestingly, also superior to the reporting rate of Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the largest database of AEFI reports established in the United States, that received annually nearly 28 000 reports of AEFI, corresponding to a AEFI reporting rate of 12.7 for 100 000 administered doses. 5,12 In conclusion, preliminary results of the twoyears' experience of the Liguria Region in post marketing surveillance of vaccine safety and in improving the signal of AEFI, by education of healthcare personnel and involvement of patients, seems to confirm the satisfactory results obtained by similar projects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…11 The reporting rate of Green Channel Centre was greater than the mean Italian reporting rate in the same period and, interestingly, also superior to the reporting rate of Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the largest database of AEFI reports established in the United States, that received annually nearly 28 000 reports of AEFI, corresponding to a AEFI reporting rate of 12.7 for 100 000 administered doses. 5,12 In conclusion, preliminary results of the twoyears' experience of the Liguria Region in post marketing surveillance of vaccine safety and in improving the signal of AEFI, by education of healthcare personnel and involvement of patients, seems to confirm the satisfactory results obtained by similar projects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The primary purpose of VAERS is to detect possible vaccine safety problems that might require further evaluation [25,26]. VAERS accepts all reports, including reports of vaccination errors, regardless of whether an AHE is documented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The causal relationships between live vaccination and rash or pneumonia, 2 commonly described complications of live vaccination in immunocompromised patients, [13][14][15] were assessed by using World Health Organization (WHO) criteria modified by CISA investigators 20 and a novel algorithm developed by the CISA Network. 18 If a subject died, cause of death provided in the medical record was accepted; previous live vaccine-preventable illnesses and vaccinations were reviewed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive investigation of live vaccine safety, including more recently introduced vaccines (ie, rotavirus), among patients with DGS is also warranted and may be enhanced using new causality assessment algorithms. [18][19][20] This study from the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) Network describes live vaccine-preventable illnesses, vaccination patterns, and adverse events following live immunization (AEFLIs) among 194 individuals with a documented chromosome 22q11.2 microdeletion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%