2012 IEEE 31st Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems 2012
DOI: 10.1109/srds.2012.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causally Coordinated Snapshot Isolation for Geographically Replicated Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is called the fork-join model. The CSI [17] model improves upon the PSI model to reduce false causal dependencies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is called the fork-join model. The CSI [17] model improves upon the PSI model to reduce false causal dependencies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we present a transaction management model for managing replicated data with different consistency levels to make suitable trade-offs between data consistency and performance. This transaction management model is based on snapshot isolation (SI) [2] with weaker semantics that guarantee causal consistency of snapshots as proposed in [19], [17]. We use the CSI [17] model as a building-block in our work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, PCSI uses vector clocks effectively to avoid maintaining any dependency information on per object level, and it does not require that updates on a partition be serialized. Only the updates on a given object are serialized which is a result of the no write-write conflict requirement, PCSI also minimizes causal dependencies by considering only the read-write sets of a transaction [26]. For obtaining the start snapshot, NMSI supports the notion of forward freshness, whereas in PCSI it is obtained in the beginning and it is "frozen".…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The start snapshot may contain events, or in other words item versions, that are not read by the transaction. In order to eliminate the false dependencies on such events, we can consider only the item versions read by t in computing T D t , as described in our earlier work on CSI [26]. However, for simplicity of discussion we omit this part in our protocol description.…”
Section: A Execution Of Local Transactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%