2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-021-03197-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causation and cognition: an epistemic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 81 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… According to a standard or radical instrumentalist view, reference to mental representations would be non‐committal with regard to their reality, even if talk of mental representations amounts to a useful theoretical device for prediction and systematisation. One problem with this approach is that it precludes construing mental representations as having any causal powers, which, in turn, would leave us unsure of how to interpret – and, perhaps, unsure if we could even accept – those cognitive scientific explanations that posit mental representations with causal roles (Taylor 2021b). For example, Marr's account of primal sketches in visual processing (Marr 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… According to a standard or radical instrumentalist view, reference to mental representations would be non‐committal with regard to their reality, even if talk of mental representations amounts to a useful theoretical device for prediction and systematisation. One problem with this approach is that it precludes construing mental representations as having any causal powers, which, in turn, would leave us unsure of how to interpret – and, perhaps, unsure if we could even accept – those cognitive scientific explanations that posit mental representations with causal roles (Taylor 2021b). For example, Marr's account of primal sketches in visual processing (Marr 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%