2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2016.05.367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causative effect of bacterial infection on pancreatic fistula and appropriate timing of drain removal after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…are cefoxitin-resistant organisms found in bile, with the former identified significantly more in CR-POPF after PD [77], and as such, may also explain the observed superiority of piperacillin-tazobactam [109]. Moreover, as piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with a significant reduction in surgical site infections [102], curbing infective complications may, in turn, avoid the formation and exacerbation of CR-POPF for which it is a risk factor [110]. However, no effect was found in PD patients with positive preoperative bile cultures [111], undergoing preoperative biliary drainage [112], or high-risk patients receiving piperacillintazobactam and gentamicin prophylaxis for 2 to 5 days postoperatively [113].…”
Section: Antibioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are cefoxitin-resistant organisms found in bile, with the former identified significantly more in CR-POPF after PD [77], and as such, may also explain the observed superiority of piperacillin-tazobactam [109]. Moreover, as piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with a significant reduction in surgical site infections [102], curbing infective complications may, in turn, avoid the formation and exacerbation of CR-POPF for which it is a risk factor [110]. However, no effect was found in PD patients with positive preoperative bile cultures [111], undergoing preoperative biliary drainage [112], or high-risk patients receiving piperacillintazobactam and gentamicin prophylaxis for 2 to 5 days postoperatively [113].…”
Section: Antibioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kimura et al [ 146 ] identified contaminated drain fluid on POD1 and POD3 to be an independent risk factor for CR-POPF which has since been corroborated in the early postoperative period PODs 1-3[ 139 ], POD1[ 147 , 148 ] and POD3[ 142 , 149 ]. The accuracy of POD1 drain culture was reported by Hata et al [ 145 ] as having a sensitivity of 0.45 and specificity of 0.813 resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.479, with specificity (0.99) similarly prevailing over sensitivity (0.32) in Morimoto et al ’s analysis of POD3 drain fluid smear tests which reported a superior PPV of 0.89[ 142 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, Enterococcus and Staphylococcus were also detected, conflicting later findings by Belmouhand’s group who reported no significant difference in the severity of POPF when drain fluid was similarly contaminated[ 150 ]. The commonly identified Enterococcus and Enterobacter species have been detected on POD1[ 146 ] and proposed to originate from bile[ 140 ]. Abe et al [ 162 ] detected Enterococcus and Enterobacter species in drain fluid with Yamashita et al [ 138 ] specifically identifying Enterococcus faecalis and Enterobacter cloacae as precipitating CR-POPF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%