Since the papers of Beadles (1907), Fearnsides (1916), andSymonds (1924), there have been numerous publications on the clinical manifestations, prognosis, and treatment of spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. The pathology of the brain has received less attention. Many accounts have been taken from routine necropsy reports and few have included detailed examinations of the brain. Intracerebral bleeding has received most attention, largely since the paper of Richardson and Hyland (1941), but recently ischaemic lesions have been more widely recognized (Robertson, 1949;Wilson, Riggs, and Rupp, 1954;Bebin and Currier, 1957). Robertson (1949) described five instances of ischaemia, and it is noteworthy that three were seen in the 10 cases he observed himself, whereas only two were recorded in more than 80 routine post-mortem reports he reviewed. The Method of Investigation At necropsy the brain was examined externally only, and the bleeding aneurysm located where this was possible without disturbing the blood lying in the fissures, or between the lobes. After fixation for one to two months in formol-saline, the basal vessels were removed from the specimen. The brain was then cut into numerous slices and the distribution of blood in the sulci and fissures noted; material for histology was taken from many areas of the cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, brain-stem, and cerebellum. Particular attention was paid to any area suggestive of infarction and sufficient sections were taken to map out the area involved.Haematoxylin and eosin staining was used routinely, but Nissl, Mallory's phosphotungstic-acidhaematoxylin, Holzer, myelin, neurofibrillary, and fat stains were used where needed.