1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1991.tb14811.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes and Associations of Severe and Persistent Specific Speech and Language Disorders in Children

Abstract: SUMMARY Eighty‐two school‐age children with severe and persistent specific speech and language disorders were studied. 71 had specific developmental language disorders, three had structural malformations (cleft palate) and eight had disorders acquired after a period of normal language development, including five with Landau‐Kleffner syndrome. The sex ratio was 38 boys to one girl. Nearly half had a family history of speech‐language disorder, with one in 52 affected siblings. Aetiological factors were found in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
37
1
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
7
37
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the singletons there were no gender differences in any of the scales, but in twins females were significantly better than males in hearing and language skills. This gender difference in language skills has been found in other studies (Neils & Aram, 1986;Robinson, 1991). At 30 months of age, twin boys were 8 months behind in expressive language and 6 months behind in verbal comprehension (Hay et al, 1987) compared to girls.…”
Section: Gender Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Among the singletons there were no gender differences in any of the scales, but in twins females were significantly better than males in hearing and language skills. This gender difference in language skills has been found in other studies (Neils & Aram, 1986;Robinson, 1991). At 30 months of age, twin boys were 8 months behind in expressive language and 6 months behind in verbal comprehension (Hay et al, 1987) compared to girls.…”
Section: Gender Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…67 In addition, language impairments have been found to occur more frequently in boys than in girls. 11,12 Because of its implication in language function, we suggest that the sex effect on parieto-temporal SLF relative tract volume and microstructure might explain the more rapid development of language skills hitherto reported in females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…[5][6][7] This difference also has been found in children, with girls having better language development at an early age [7][8][9][10] and boys experiencing more frequent language impairments. 11,12 Therefore, postmortem pathologic and in vivo quantitative brain imaging studies have been looking for differences between males and females. In adults, several studies have shown that men have larger (by ϳ10%) brains than women.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a brain lesion spares the neural substrates of word learning, speakers may retain some functional plasticity in the creation of new phonetic plans. The possible sex bias in the incidence of FAS might reflect a greater female facility in word learning (Robinson, 1991) or different patterns of sex-linked ageing in the neural structures underpinning the word learning process. We have developed elsewhere the view that normal speech production is the result of activation of phonetic gestalts for frequently encountered utterance units (Varley & Whiteside, 2001;Whiteside & Varley, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%