Causes and Consequences of Local Government Efforts to Reduce Risk and Adapt to Extreme Weather Events: Municipal Organizational Robustness

Abstract

This research article investigates the causes and consequences of municipal institutional arrangements for the provision of resilient critical infrastructure in municipalities. The study explains how the municipal organizational robustness and external institutional dynamics moderate the relation between capacities, leadership, and local government investment decisions. We examine hypotheses on moderating effects with regression methods, using data from 345 Chilean municipalities over a nine-year period, and analyzing the evidence with support of qualitative data. Our results reveal that municipal organizational robustness—operational rules, planning, managerial flexibility and integration, and accountability—is the most quantitatively outstanding moderating factor. The evidence leads us to deduce that efforts to support local governments in the emerging policy domain of resilient critical infrastructure require special attention to the robustness of municipal institutional arrangements. The results are valid for countries where the local governments have responsibilities to fulfill and their decisions have consequences for the adaptation. Since one of the objectives of the Special Issue “Bringing Governance Back Home—Lessons for Local Government Regarding Rapid Climate Action” is to explore how action is enabled or constrained by institutional relations in which the actors are embedded, this study contributes to achieving the goal.

Can Restoration of the Commons Reduce Rural Vulnerability? A Quasi-Experimental Comparison of COVID-19 Livelihood-based Coping Strategies among Rural Households in Three Indian States

“…This includes prioritizing collective action, identifying needs and possible responses, addressing differences of opinion, managing conflicts, negotiating benefit-sharing agreements, and deliberating about how to deal with crises. Villages with solid institutional frameworks in place are better equipped to deal with external shocks, such as COVID-19, because such institutions provide the means for people to work together in a more strategic and cost-effective manner (Andersson et al, 2018;Torpey-Saboe et al, 2015;Valdivieso et al, 2021). Since we did not ask respondents in the phone survey about these institutional variables, we leave it to future work to evaluate this potential institutional causal mechanism.…”

The Moderating Effects of Institutional Framing on Authentic Leadership-Physical Asset Management Practices Relationships in Local Governments in Uganda

“…This result supports other studies which investigated the positive aspects of the institutional framing of PAM practices (Leky et al, 2020). In most studies conducted on the LGs' functioning, the positive effects of institutional framing have generally been mentioned (Valdivieso et al, 2021;Kim et al, 2019;Teles, 2012). In addition, with other studies on PAM practices considered, it can be understood that institutional framing has positively affected the practices and other related areas.…”

Can Restoration of the Commons Foster Resilience? A Quasi-Experimental Comparison of COVID-19 Coping Strategies among Rural Households in Three Indian States

“…This includes prioritizing collective action, identifying needs and possible responses, addressing differences of opinions, managing conflicts, negotiating benefit-sharing agreements, and deliberating about how to deal with crises. Villages with solid institutional frameworks in place are better equipped to deal with external shocks, such as COVID-19, because such institutions provide the means for people to work together in a more strategic and costeffective manner (Andersson et al, 2018;Torpey-Saboe et al, 2015;Valdivieso et al, 2021). Since, we did not ask respondents in the phone survey about these institutional variables, we leave it to future work to evaluate this potential institutional causal mechanism.…”