2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes and consequences of teen childbearing: Evidence from a reproductive health intervention in South Africa

Abstract: We use a natural experiment to estimate the causal impact of a public health intervention aimed at reducing teenage childbearing. The geographic and timing variation in the rollout of the South African National Adolescent Friendly Clinic Initiative (NAFCI) in the early 2000s provides a plausibly exogenous increase in reproductive health knowledge and clinical access for teens. We investigate the causal pathway from the intervention's initial impact on early-teen childbearing to subsequent consequences for late… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improvement in the accessibility of contraceptive methods reduces economic and psychological costs for women, but evidence of empirical performance is mixed depending on the countries, methods, and selected outcomes (Branson and Byker 2018;Strupat 2017;Kagesten et al 2014;Ashcraft, Fernández-Val, and Lang 2013;Desai and Tarozzi 2011;Phillips, Bawah, and Binka 2006;Sinha 2005;Gertler and Molyneaux 1994). Despite the fact that there is no consensus in the evidence about the sign or the quantitative impact of contraceptive policies on teen births, there is evidence of the extensive and intensive rise in their use, as well as evidence of improvement in health outcomes (Bongaarts 2014;Cleland et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvement in the accessibility of contraceptive methods reduces economic and psychological costs for women, but evidence of empirical performance is mixed depending on the countries, methods, and selected outcomes (Branson and Byker 2018;Strupat 2017;Kagesten et al 2014;Ashcraft, Fernández-Val, and Lang 2013;Desai and Tarozzi 2011;Phillips, Bawah, and Binka 2006;Sinha 2005;Gertler and Molyneaux 1994). Despite the fact that there is no consensus in the evidence about the sign or the quantitative impact of contraceptive policies on teen births, there is evidence of the extensive and intensive rise in their use, as well as evidence of improvement in health outcomes (Bongaarts 2014;Cleland et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using various balancing tests, we find 2 For example, in the context of developing countries, Ranchhod et al (2011) and Ardington et al (2015) show that teenage childbearing reduces education in South Africa using propensity score matching approach. Branson and Byker (2018) study a reproductive health intervention in South Africa and find that delaying teen childbearing increases schooling. no significant differences in the observable characteristics of treated (teenage mothers) and control groups after using inverse propensity score weights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 For example, in the context of developing countries, Ranchhod et al (2011) and Ardington et al (2015) show that teenage childbearing reduces education in South Africa using propensity score matching approach. Branson and Byker (2018) study a reproductive health intervention in South Africa and find that delaying teen childbearing increases schooling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] The long-term impact attributed to NAFCI is a lower likelihood of teen childbearing, enabling adolescents to complete more years of schooling and earn higher wages when they are young adults. [19] This exemplifies the potential for achieving 'triple dividend' with effective interventions to prevent unintended pregnancy during adolescence: better health and wellbeing during adolescence and adulthood, which will benefit the next generation. [20] Declaration.…”
Section: Implications For Policy and Practice In South Africamentioning
confidence: 98%