2016
DOI: 10.1080/1540496x.2015.1103126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes and Impacts of Foreign and Domestic Institutional Investors’ Herding in the Taiwan Stock Market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 shows that the random-effect model results support the feedback trading hypothesis and FII herding behavior. The results are in accordance with the findings of Hiremath and Kattuman (2017), Fang et al (2017), andChattopadhyay et al (2018). Foreign institutions tend to herd their own or other foreign institutions' investments in the previous, fourth lagged and seventh lagged periods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 2 shows that the random-effect model results support the feedback trading hypothesis and FII herding behavior. The results are in accordance with the findings of Hiremath and Kattuman (2017), Fang et al (2017), andChattopadhyay et al (2018). Foreign institutions tend to herd their own or other foreign institutions' investments in the previous, fourth lagged and seventh lagged periods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In their research, Chattopadhyay et al (2018) find that foreign institutions tend to follow a herding behavior in the Indian stock market, and that this herding tends to persist. In their study, Fang et al (2017) reveal that foreign institutions herd the trades of other foreign institutions rather than herding their own trades in the Taiwan market. This herding is most common in large-cap securities and is driven by investigative herding rather than cascades.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chung et al (2016) investigated the trading activity of institutional investors in the stock market in South Korea and found evidence suggesting that they may be considered as the contrarian traders and that their transactions are consistent with persistent trading and/or herding behavior effects 3 . Fang et al (2017) find the existence of herding effects among the foreign institutional investors also on the stock market in Taiwan, where the main reason for their herding behavior is investigative herding rather than informational cascades. Bravo and Ruiz (2015) analyze pension system in Chile and they discuss herding effects as well; however, their research is focused more specifically on the herding behavior of pension funds managers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, many researchers used the measure of Hwang and Salmon (Güvercı̇n, 2016;Krokida, Spyrou, & Tsouknidis, 2017;Lin, (2017); Teng, 2018). The measures of the second group, Lakonishoket al (1992) and Sias (2004), were also used in many studies to measure herding behavior (Boyd, Buyuksahin, Haigh, & Harris, 2016;Cai, Han, Li, & Li, 2019;Choi, 2016;Fang, Lu, Yau, & Lee, 2017;Popescu & Xu, 2018). In addition, many studies were conducted using more than one measure including Shrotryia and Kalra (2019) who used three measures of CSSD, CSAD, and a modified CSSD measure introduced by Yao, Ma, and He (2014).…”
Section: Measures Of Herding Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%