Causes of and contributors to infant mortality in a rural community of North India: evidence from verbal and social autopsy

Abstract

ObjectiveTo identify the medical causes of death and contribution of non-biological factors towards infant mortality by a retrospective analysis of routinely collected data using verbal and social autopsy tools.SettingThe study site was Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS), Ballabgarh, North IndiaParticipantsAll infant deaths during the years 2008–2012 were included for verbal autopsy and infant deaths from July 2012 to December 2012 were included for social autopsy.Outcome measuresCause of death ascertained by a validated verbal autopsy tool and level of delay based on a three-delay model using the INDEPTH social autopsy tool were the main outcome measures. The level of delay was defined as follows: level 1, delay in identification of danger signs and decision making to seek care; level 2, delay in reaching a health facility from home; level 3, delay in getting healthcare at the health facility.ResultsThe infant mortality rate during the study period was 46.5/1000 live births. Neonatal deaths contributed to 54.3% of infant deaths and 39% occurred on the first day of life. Birth asphyxia (31.5%) followed by low birth weight (LBW)/prematurity (26.5%) were the most common causes of neonatal death, while infection (57.8%) was the most common cause of post-neonatal death. Care-seeking was delayed among 50% of neonatal deaths and 41.2% of post-neonatal deaths. Delay at level 1 was most common and occurred in 32.4% of neonatal deaths and 29.4% of post-neonatal deaths. Deaths due to LBW/prematurity were mostly followed by delay at level 1.ConclusionA high proportion of preventable infant mortality still exists in an area which is under continuous health and demographic surveillance. There is a need to enhance home-based preventive care to enable the mother to identify and respond to danger signs. Verbal autopsy and social autopsy could be routinely done to guide policy interventions aimed at reduction of infant mortality.

When Do Newborns Die? Timing and Cause-Specific Neonatal Death in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Referral Hospital in Gedeo Zone: A Prospective Cohort Study

“…In the present study, 11.6% of neonates died during followup. We found that most of the deaths occurred during the first (34.0%) and second (61.3%) weeks of neonatal life, which were in line with the previous systematic review studies [7,8] and the studies done in India [32] and Tanzania [33] and also the studies done in Ethiopia [10,[22][23][24].…”

Mortality in children with cerebral palsy in rural Bangladesh: a population‐based surveillance study

“…death registers). In the absence of such systems, in LMICs, verbal autopsies are commonly used to ascertain the underlying and immediate CoD among specific populations of both children and adults . However, population level mortality and/or verbal autopsy data are not routinely available for children with CP in LMICs such as Bangladesh.…”

Pattern and Outcome of Neonatal Admissions- An Experience From a District Level Scnu

“…Deaths due to LBW/ prematurity were mostly due to delay in identification of danger signs and decision making to seek care. (4) About 0.75 million neonates die in India every year, the highest for any country in the world. The rate of decline in NMR and to some extent EMNR has accelerated with the introduction of National Rural Health Mission in mid 2005.…”

“…(2) Also it has been seen that delay in identification of danger signs, delayed decision to seek care and absence of health personnel during transport and referral had significant correlation with mortality. (3,4) In order to further bring down the neonatal and infant mortality and to bridge the urban rural gap it is imperative to shift the focus of neonatal research to the peripheral level health facilities and understand the challenges posed by the socio-demographic profile of the populations in these areas.…”