Causes of cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects in Asia

Abstract

PurposeOne of the world's largest construction markets is in Asia where construction activity is boosted by investment on transport infrastructure. This paper aims to identify and analyse causes of cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects in Asia and assess their importance and statistical relationship with project size.Design/methodology/approachThe paper pursues the following objectives. First, it identifies factors contributing to cost overruns. Second, using case data and regression analysis, it establishes the statistical relationship between project size and cost overruns. Third, it analyses questionnaire data to rank causes of cost overruns according to their frequency, severity and significance. Last, the paper identifies contract types mostly associated with cost escalation.FindingsThe findings confirm a moderate correlation between cost overruns and one indicator of project size. Awarding contracts to the lowest bidder is identified as the most significant cause of cost overruns. Lump‐sum contracts were found to have the greatest influence on the occurrence of cost overruns.Research limitations/implicationsStratified sampling would allow the evaluation of how cost overruns are perceived by different professional groups. Further research can focus on measures for the prevention of cost overruns.Originality/valueThe causes of cost overruns have been at the focal point of research however, most studies consider cost overruns in specific Asian countries. Moreover, transport infrastructure projects have received little attention or been underrepresented in datasets comprising general construction projects. The paper seeks to fill this gap by carrying out in‐depth investigation of cost overruns in transport infrastructure in the broader context of Asia.

Project Team Perception of Causes of Building Cost Overruns: A Reflection in Tanzania

“…These imply key project actors agree on the causative factors of cost overrun in building construction projects. Such a perception is also a sound base for successful control of cost overrun as it is bound to instigate team effort [10]. The result of this study also conform to a survey of construction projects at Gaza Strip that established that there was agreement between contractors, consultants and clients regarding causes of delays and cost overruns [10].…”

“…Park and Papadopoulos [10] cite Olawale and Sun (2010) and Jha and Devaya (2008) who admit that although the causes of cost overrun in projects share common characteristics worldwide, they are also affected by country-specific conditions such as political, economic, legislative, social and cultural factors. The author hence has attempted to make Tanzania a case specific, though acknowledging the fact that the results have a wider application to similar economies.…”

Entropy-Based Risk Control of Geological Disasters in Mountain Tunnels Under Uncertain Environments

“…Once these disasters occur, it will not only cause delays in construction, economic losses, but also cause casualties [11]. Due to the widespread existence of various types of risks mentioned above, overruns and delays are widespread in tunnel engineering [12,13]. How to deal with relevant uncertainties and control risk within an acceptable level with reasonable time, cost and limited resources, which is not only an important concern, but also a difficult issue in tunnel engineering and academic circles.…”

Determining Significant Mitigation Measures of Detrimental Variations in Public Building Projects in Tanzania

“…Most building projects are liable to variations that might be caused by change of mind of the clients, consultants or any unforeseen scope of the project raised by one of the project participants. These changes can lead to deviations from the sum stipulated in the contract [18]. Evidently, most construction projects especially in developing countries, usually suffer from cost and time overruns due to variations in project plans with the consequence of stagnated economic development [16,6].…”