2013
DOI: 10.1586/14787210.2014.866516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes of false-positive HIV rapid diagnostic test results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
82
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
4
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the median time between initial test and enrolment of the study was 392 days (IQR: 45, 1587) and there is a lack of data from the time of the initial HIV test, we are unable to determine the cause of the misdiagnosis. However, systematic reviews have identified several potential causes of misdiagnosis [3,17]. In a WHO report on misdiagnosis, user error, suboptimal testing strategy, cross-reactivity and poor management, and supervision practices were suggested as factors related to less than optimal test specificity [3].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the median time between initial test and enrolment of the study was 392 days (IQR: 45, 1587) and there is a lack of data from the time of the initial HIV test, we are unable to determine the cause of the misdiagnosis. However, systematic reviews have identified several potential causes of misdiagnosis [3,17]. In a WHO report on misdiagnosis, user error, suboptimal testing strategy, cross-reactivity and poor management, and supervision practices were suggested as factors related to less than optimal test specificity [3].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a major cause of false positivity with rapid diagnostic tests (RDT). 17 A study sample of 1517 patients in south-western Uganda revealed 43.9% false positive rates that used a 'tie-breaker' algorithm (129/295 positive results) similar to NACO guidelines prevalent in India. 18 During interaction with sister laboratories in the city, we have been apprised that a major confusion exists due the false positive reports in this platform though the precise data is unavailable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, exposure to parasites may produce polyclonal B-cell activation responsible for the high rate of false-positive immunoassays results reported in African patients. 19 Vairo and others have estimated that although sensitivity of IgG enzyme immunoassay test for dengue is nearly 100%, specificity could be substantially diminished in African populations. 20 Taken all together, these data suggest that prevalence studies using anti-dengue IgG antibodies in the African continent may be overestimating dengue infection and should be interpreted cautiously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%