2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.10.20225243
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes of Outcome Learning: A causal inference-inspired machine learning approach to disentangling common combinations of potential causes of a health outcome

Abstract: Nearly all diseases can be caused by different combinations of exposures. Yet, most epidemiological studies focus on the causal effect of a single exposure on an outcome. We present the Causes of Outcome Learning (CoOL) approach, which seeks to identify combinations of exposures (which can be interpreted causally if all causal assumptions are met) that could be responsible for an increased risk of a health outcome in population sub-groups. The approach allows for exposures acting alone and in synergy with othe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We applied the Causes of Outcome Learning approach [14,15] to identify vulnerable subgroups with a combination of baseline information that was associated with a higher risk of child mortality. This causal inference-inspired machine learning approach has been optimized to prevent causal biases such as confounding by calendar time and collider bias, which could occur in other supervised clustering approaches.…”
Section: Multifactorial Risk Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied the Causes of Outcome Learning approach [14,15] to identify vulnerable subgroups with a combination of baseline information that was associated with a higher risk of child mortality. This causal inference-inspired machine learning approach has been optimized to prevent causal biases such as confounding by calendar time and collider bias, which could occur in other supervised clustering approaches.…”
Section: Multifactorial Risk Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%