Causes of the delay in creating permanent vascular access in hemodialysis patients

Alfarhan, Maha A.; Almatrafi, Shahad A; Alqaseer, Sumaia M; Albkiry, Yara A.; Al-Sayyari, Abdulla A

doi:10.4103/1319-2442.308330

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The most common factor for refusal of permanent access formation was fear of pain in our study 65(43.3%), while 32(21.3%) denied their disease. Our results are similar to the study done by Alfarhan et al [ 19 ] which showed denial in 76.4% and fear 75.9% as major causes of delay in permanent vascular access formation.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Delay in Permanent Vascular Access Formation and Referral to a Nephrologist in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Single Center Experience

Khatri¹,

Nasir²,

Dhrolia³

et al. 2021

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This study assessed the factors associated with delayed referral to a nephrologist and delay in formation of a permanent vascular access in incident hemodialysis (HD) patients. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2021 to July 2021 on end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) at our center. Data were collected at the bedside during the HD session about a referral to a nephrologist, about when they were asked for permanent vascular access formation and the reason for the delay in its formation. Results: Out of 296 patients recruited in our study, 168 (56.8%) were male and 128 (43.2) were female. The mean age was 53.5±15 years (minimum of 19 years and maximum of 90 years). The most common reason for refusal of making permanent vascular access [arterio-venous fistula (AVF) or arterio-venous graft (AVG)] was fear of pain in our patients 65 (43.3%) followed by the denial of the disease 32 (21.3%). Among the study subjects, 231 (78%) patients were referred to the nephrologist immediately or within one month of their diagnosis. Some 152 (51.4%) of the patients were not in favor of making AVF whereas 151 (51%) refused for starting HD, hence most of our patients 181 (61.1%) initiated HD in emergency by a central venous catheter (CVC). Conclusion: Early referral should be done by primary care physicians (PCPs) for the timely management of CKD patients. As CKD is a progressive disease, it requires special attention by a nephrologist for adjustment of patient’s medications, timely follow-up, counseling, the early formation of AVF for HD, and planning for renal transplant. In our study, the majority of our patients initiated their HD via CVC because of the delayed visit to a nephrologist. Most patients were asked for AVF formation on the same day of presentation to our nephrology unit as they had advanced CKD (Stage 5) 134 (51.4%). Most patients in our study delayed AVF formation 152 (51.4%). With timely referral to a nephrologist, the nephrologist will be able to do better and repeated counseling about the disease, its progression, and the need for permanent vascular access for initiation of HD while patients and their families will get more time to make decisions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Out of these, 54.6% were not referred to nephrology [ 18 ]. Alfarhan et al found that the most important physician and hospital factors are insufficient conduction of pre-dialysis care and education (63.7%) and late referral to a nephrologist (56.6%) [ 19 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Delay in Permanent Vascular Access Formation and Referral to a Nephrologist in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Single Center Experience

Khatri¹,

Nasir²,

Dhrolia³

et al. 2021

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In a cross-sectional investigation involving hemodialysis patients, Shamasneh et al [124] found that 17.8% of patients denied their disease or even their need for hemodialysis. Alfarhan et al [125] conducted a similar study reporting higher prevalence rates of denial of chronic kidney disease and of the need of hemodialysis that were detected in 76.4% of the sample.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Illness Denial in Medical Disorders: A Systematic Review

Patierno

Fava

Carrozzino

2023

Psychother Psychosom

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Illness denial pertains to medical patients who do not acknowledge the presence or severity of their disease or the need of treatment. Objective: This systematic review was performed to clarify the clinical role and manifestations of illness denial, its impact on health attitudes and behavior, as well as on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with medical disorders. Methods: The systematic search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Results: The initial search yielded a total of 14,098 articles; 176 studies met the criteria for inclusion. Illness denial appeared to be a relatively common condition affecting a wide spectrum of health attitudes and behavior. In some cases, it may help a person cope with various stages of illness and treatment. In other situations, it may determine delay in seeking treatment, impaired adherence, and reduced self-management, leading to adverse outcomes. The Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR) were found to set a useful severity threshold for the condition. An important clinical distinction can also be made based on the DCPR for illness denial, which require the assessment of whether the patient has been provided with an adequate appraisal of the medical situation. Conclusions: This systematic review indicates that patients with medical disorders experience and express illness denial in many forms and with varying degrees of severity. The findings suggest the need for a multidimensional assessment and provide challenging insights into the management of medical disorders.

show abstract

¿Es posible alcanzar el objetivo de catéteres propuesto por las guías? Razones que determinan el uso de catéter en pacientes prevalentes en hemodiálisis

Arenas,

Cazar,

Cordón

et al. 2024

Nefrología

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Causes of the delay in creating permanent vascular access in hemodialysis patients

Cited by 4 publications

References 19 publications

Delay in Permanent Vascular Access Formation and Referral to a Nephrologist in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Single Center Experience

Delay in Permanent Vascular Access Formation and Referral to a Nephrologist in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: A Single Center Experience

Illness Denial in Medical Disorders: A Systematic Review

¿Es posible alcanzar el objetivo de catéteres propuesto por las guías? Razones que determinan el uso de catéter en pacientes prevalentes en hemodiálisis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About