2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.05.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes of variation in BCG vaccine efficacy: Examining evidence from the BCG REVAC cluster randomized trial to explore the masking and the blocking hypotheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(52 reference statements)
5
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This may represent an example of masking of the BCG-induced immune response, which has previously been described in children (33). Nevertheless, we demonstrate that BCG is immunogenic, even in the context of prior sensitization, providing evidence against the contrary hypothesis of immunological blocking of the BCG-induced immune response (34). Our study does not address whether these findings have implications for BCG-induced protective immunity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…This may represent an example of masking of the BCG-induced immune response, which has previously been described in children (33). Nevertheless, we demonstrate that BCG is immunogenic, even in the context of prior sensitization, providing evidence against the contrary hypothesis of immunological blocking of the BCG-induced immune response (34). Our study does not address whether these findings have implications for BCG-induced protective immunity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…48 However, it is important to consider that in this older target population vaccination with a BCG replacement vaccine candidate could result in significant masking and blocking effects to vaccination due to preexisting immune responses resulting from previous infection with non-tuberculous environmental mycobacteria. [49][50][51][52] Importantly, a current disadvantage in BCG replacement vaccines is that its administration in a population with compromised immune system could be insecure and even deadly. This important gap can be overcome in future vaccine research by the combined use of different deletions into the same M. tb strain in new candidates for BCG replacement vaccines, improving deletion of M. tb virulence genes.…”
Section: Main Challenges In the Next Yearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a clinical study has being conducted in BCG‐unvaccinated adults living in an area not endemic for TB, to determine the safety of the MTBVAC vaccine . However, it is important to consider that in this older target population vaccination with a BCG replacement vaccine candidate could result in significant masking and blocking effects to vaccination due to preexisting immune responses resulting from previous infection with non‐tuberculous environmental mycobacteria …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MTBVAC) would induce specific long-term immune responses against certain T cell epitopes that are present in M. tuberculosis and absent in BCG and which may be important for protection [38,83]. Moreover, neonatal vaccination with live-attenuated M. tuberculosis vaccines could represent by far the most effective strategy for conferring high-quality protective immunity against TB, as healthy newborns represent the most sensitive and immunologically naïve population without preexisting mycobacterial immunity, which in older age groups can lead to potential masking and blocking effects to vaccination [18,87]. Additionally, considering the similar biological nature of novel live-attenuated M. tuberculosis vaccines and BCG makes one consider that these novel candidates may also possess the inherent nonspecific benefits attributed to BCG and as such, it would be important to consider evaluating them in advanced clinical development trials.…”
Section: Expert Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…those in the region of difference 1 (RD1) region) in the process of its attenuation by repeated subcultivation passaging in nonstandardized conditions could be one of the reasons [16,17]. Moreover, large number of human clinical trials suggest that revaccination with BCG does not provide additional benefit, which could be due to preexisting heterologous immunity resulting from infection with nontuberculous environmental mycobacteria (NTM), a process known as masking and blocking [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%