1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-5155(99)00128-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes of Visual Field Defects After Vitrectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Each of these theories is reinforced by the observation that techniques to limit intraocular pressure spikes, surgical time, and retinal dehydration 15 have led to lower rates of such complications. 12 Although no surgery has taken place in our patients, an interesting recent theory is relevant to our group: that shearing damage may occur during the peeling of the posterior vitreous from the point where it is tightly adherent to the disc and RNFL (usually at the nasal margin) 16 as is often required in such surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Each of these theories is reinforced by the observation that techniques to limit intraocular pressure spikes, surgical time, and retinal dehydration 15 have led to lower rates of such complications. 12 Although no surgery has taken place in our patients, an interesting recent theory is relevant to our group: that shearing damage may occur during the peeling of the posterior vitreous from the point where it is tightly adherent to the disc and RNFL (usually at the nasal margin) 16 as is often required in such surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Welch [20] sowie Takenaka u. Mitarb. [19] fanden eine Beziehung zwischen der Lage der Gesichtsfelddefekte und der Position des Infusionsports. Sie beobachteten ausschlieûlich Gesichtsfelddefekte im nasal unteren Quadranten nachdem sie den Infusionsport nicht wie üblich temporal, sondern nasal unten platzierten.…”
Section: Patienten Und Methodenunclassified
“…[2][3][4][5][6] Several clinical studies on patients developing VFDs after macular hole surgery featuring fluid-air exchange have provided strong evidence that infusion of pressurized air is damaging. [7][8][9] A relationship between the location of a VFD and that of the infusion cannula has been confirmed in multiple studies. 9,10 Several animal studies have shown that a pressurized air flow damages the inner retinal layer, creating irregularities in the internal limiting membrane (ILM), detachment of the ILM, and exposure of the Müller cells and nerve fiber bundles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[7][8][9] A relationship between the location of a VFD and that of the infusion cannula has been confirmed in multiple studies. 9,10 Several animal studies have shown that a pressurized air flow damages the inner retinal layer, creating irregularities in the internal limiting membrane (ILM), detachment of the ILM, and exposure of the Müller cells and nerve fiber bundles. 11,12 Such surface changes in the retina provide direct evidence of mechanical damage caused by a pressurized air flow.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%