2013
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caveats for Using Shock Tube in Blast-Induced Traumatic Brain Injury Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the mechanisms of such injuries are very difficult to compare across the different models and many parameters involved (Svetlov et al, 2009). The pressure profile generated from such devices also may not match the specific profile produced by military explosives (see Chen and Constantini, 2013). Accordingly, precise RDX assemblies and their localized detonations were a key addition to the new blast paradigm, and they were shown to alter membrane permeability and induce axonal beading in PC12 cells and human neuroblastoma cells (Zander et al, 2015, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mechanisms of such injuries are very difficult to compare across the different models and many parameters involved (Svetlov et al, 2009). The pressure profile generated from such devices also may not match the specific profile produced by military explosives (see Chen and Constantini, 2013). Accordingly, precise RDX assemblies and their localized detonations were a key addition to the new blast paradigm, and they were shown to alter membrane permeability and induce axonal beading in PC12 cells and human neuroblastoma cells (Zander et al, 2015, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be illustrated by using various mathematical transformations, such as the Hopf-Cole transformation, these basic forms of Burgers' equation can be reduced to the heat-and diffusion-equation, which together are another two (almost identical) results, particularly crucial in terms of further modeling other factors, such as the heat and diffusion transfer rates due to cavitation, [7], within this analysis [12]. The wave-equation may also be applicable here, especially in terms of modeling other aspects of the propagation, such as vast increases in both pressure and energy levels resulting from reflection of propagating shock-waves.…”
Section: The Burgers' and Transport Equations As Appropriate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, shock-waves that impact the human skull at angles other than at 90 • must also be considered, as must the whole asymmetric mechanics of neurological shock-waves in a more holistic sense. It is, therefore, important to at least state the analogous equation, as illustrated by Gerber [11], which reads: R = dp dη sin (µ + λ) dp dζ sin (µ − λ) (12) where: dp dζ = cos (µ) dp ds + sin (µ) dp dn (13) and: dp dη = cos (µ) dp ds + sin (µ) dp dn (14) where p represents pressure, and µ and λ are the angles of incidence in the directions of ζ and η, respectively, for some dummy-variables, s and n. One should, therefore, adopt Equation (12), and the directional derivatives-Equations (13) and (14)-for more complex situations in which multi-directional shock-waves need to be modeled.…”
Section: Preliminary Mathematical Exposition: the Effect Of The Direcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What has received less attention is the process by which this happens and the relation between shock tube parameters and the characteristics of the resulting 'blast wave '. A remaining open question [13] is whether the pseudo blast wave that forms in the shock tube actually corresponds to the commonly accepted quasi-exponential Friedlander wave form [14,15]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%